ScalingStacks

4.2.1. Main Theorem

We put HHi=HHi(W,S)=ToriPen⁡(P,−):Pen​−modgr→P​−modgr\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{i}=\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{i}^{(W,S)}=\operatorname{Tor}\nolimits_{i}^{P^{{\mathrm{en}}}}(P,-):P^{{\mathrm{en}}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits\to P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits. This gives rise to functors HHi:Hob⁡(Pen​−modgr)→Hob⁡(P​−modgr)\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{i}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P^{{\mathrm{en}}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits) and to a functor HH∗:Hob⁡(Pen​−modgr)→Hob⁡(P​−modgr)𝐙\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{*}:\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P^{{\mathrm{en}}}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)\to\operatorname{Ho}\nolimits^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{{\mathbf{Z}}}.

Given I⊂SI\subset S, we have a functor ρI∗:Db​(PI​−modgr)𝐙→Db​(P​−modgr)𝐙\rho_{I}^{*}:D^{b}(P_{I}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{\mathbf{Z}}\to D^{b}(P\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{\mathbf{Z}}. This defines a functor from 𝒞​o​x{\mathcal{C}}{ox} to graded triangulated categories (W,S)↦Db​(PS​−modgr)𝐙(W,S)\mapsto D^{b}(P_{S}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{\mathbf{Z}}. Our grading here is the one coming from PS​−modgrP_{S}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits.

The following theorem is a consequence of Theorem 5.1 below.

0P20

Theorem 4.5. The functors HH∗S\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{*}^{S} define a Markov 22-trace on finite Coxeter groups with value in 𝒞S=Db​(PS​−modgr)𝐙{\mathcal{C}}_{S}=D^{b}(P_{S}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{\mathbf{Z}} and with TS,s,+=[−1]​{1}T_{S,s,+}=[-1]\{1\} and TS,s,−=IdT_{S,s,-}=\operatorname{Id}\nolimits.

Passing to homology, we obtain the following result.

0P21

Corollary 4.6. The functors H∗​HH∗SH^{*}\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{*}^{S} define a Markov 22-trace on finite Coxeter groups with value in 𝒞S=((PS​−modgr)𝐙)𝐙{\mathcal{C}}_{S}=\bigl((P_{S}\operatorname{\!-modgr}\nolimits)^{\mathbf{Z}}\bigr)^{{\mathbf{Z}}} and with TS,s,+=[−1]​{1}T_{S,s,+}=[-1]\{1\} and TS,s,−=IdT_{S,s,-}=\operatorname{Id}\nolimits.

The construction of §4.1.3 provides a Markov trace, recovering a result of Lasy [La1, La2]. Note that Webster and Williamson [WeWi] have shown that for finite Weyl groups, this is actually Gomi’s trace, as conjectured by J. Michel. That has been shown to hold also in type I2​(n)I_{2}(n) by Lasy [La1].

0P22

Corollary 4.7 (Lasy). The following defines a Markov trace on finite Coxeter groups:

ℬ(W,S)∋b↦∑d,i,j(−1)j​dimHj​(HHiS⁡(Fb))d​q−d​t−i∈𝐙⁡[q±1,t±1]{\mathcal{B}}_{(W,S)}\ni b\mapsto\sum_{d,i,j}(-1)^{j}\dim H^{j}(\operatorname{HH}\nolimits_{i}^{S}(F_{b}))_{d}q^{-d}t^{-i}\in{\mathbf{Z}}[q^{\pm 1},t^{\pm 1}]

corresponding to t+=−tt_{+}=-t and t−=1t_{-}=1.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Raphaël Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:1203.5065v1