ScalingStacks

0N4Y

Proof. Since M0↪MM_{0}\hookrightarrow M is a proper embedding, a compactly supported section over MM can be restricted to obtain a compactly supported section over M0M_{0}, as well as over M∖M′M\smallsetminus M^{\prime} and over M∖M′′M\smallsetminus M^{\prime\prime}. Namely, there is a diagram among spaces of compactly supported sections

Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)×Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\times\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M,X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M∖M′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M\smallsetminus M^{\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M∖M′′,X)\textstyle{\Gammac(M\smallsetminus M^{\prime\prime},X)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X).\textstyle{\Gammac(M_{0},X).}

By inspection, the bottom horizontal sequence is a fiber sequence, as is the right vertical sequence, as is the diagonal sequence. Also, the inner square is pullback because M′​⋃M0×ℝ​M′′≅MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M is a pushout. Because M0⊂MM_{0}\subset M is equipped with a regular neighborhood, these fiber sequences are in fact Serre fibration sequences, and so the inner square is a weak homotopy pullback square. In particular, there is a right homotopy coherent action of Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X) on Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X), a left homotopy coherent action of Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X) on Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X), and a continuous map of topological spaces

(7) Γ𝖼⁡(M′,X)​×Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)​Γ𝖼⁡(M′′,X)⟶Γ𝖼⁡(M,X)\Gammac(M^{\prime},X)\underset{\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X)}{\times}\Gammac(M^{\prime\prime},X)\longrightarrow\Gammac(M,X)

from the balanced homotopy coinvariants. Because X→BX\to B is nn-connective and M0M_{0} is (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional, the base Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)\Gammac(M_{0},X) is connected. It follows that the map (7) is in fact a weak homotopy equivalence. The assertion follows after the canonical identification Ω​Γ𝖼⁡(M0,X)≅Γ𝖼⁡(M0×ℝ,X)\Omega\Gammac(M_{0},X)\cong\Gammac(M_{0}\times\mathbb{R},X) as group-like ℰ1\mathcal{E}_{1}-spaces.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6