ScalingStacks

0N5F

Proposition 5.9. For any object Vβˆˆπ’±V\in\mathcal{V} in a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable, there is an natural equivalence

𝖑𝖺𝗋⁑(π–₯𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇⁑(𝖡))≃π–₯π—‹π–Ύπ–Ύπ—‡βˆ’πŸ£β‘(Σ​𝖡){\sf Bar}\bigl(\free_{n}(V)\bigr)~\simeq~\free_{n-1}(\Sigma V)

between the bar construction on the free nn-disk algebra on VV and the free (nβˆ’1)(n-1)-disk algebra generated by the suspension of VV.

0N5G

Proof. Via ExampleΒ 3.10, each augmented associative algebra Aβ†’πŸ™A\to\uno in 𝒱\mathcal{V} determines a symmetric monoidal functor A:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„πŸ£βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹β†’π’±A\colon\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{1}\to\mathcal{V}. Applying βŠ—\otimes-excision in this simplest case of the collar-gluing [βˆ’1,1)⋃(βˆ’1,1)(βˆ’1,1]β‰…[βˆ’1,1][-1,1)\underset{(-1,1)}{\bigcup}(-1,1]\cong[-1,1], we have that the bar construction 𝖑𝖺𝗋⁑(A){\sf Bar}(A) is identifiable as the factorization homology over the closed 1-disk:

𝖑𝖺𝗋⁑(A)β‰ƒβˆ«π”»1A.{\sf Bar}(A)~\simeq~\int_{\mathbb{D}^{1}}A~.

PropositionΒ 5.5 gives the first and last of the following identifications

βˆ«π”»1×ℝnβˆ’1​π–₯𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇​(𝖡)\displaystyle\underset{\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}{\int}\free_{n}(V) ≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐iβ‰₯0π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(𝔻1×ℝnβˆ’1,βˆ‚π”»1×ℝnβˆ’1)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£i​VβŠ—i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1},\partial\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐iβ‰₯0Ξ£iβ€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(ℝnβˆ’1)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£i​VβŠ—i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\Sigma^{i}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐iβ‰₯0π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(ℝnβˆ’1)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£i​(Σ​V)βŠ—i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}(\Sigma V)^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq π–₯π—‹π–Ύπ–Ύπ—‡βˆ’πŸ£β‘(Σ​𝖡).\displaystyle\free_{n-1}(\Sigma V)~.

The second identification follows from the Ξ£i\Sigma_{i}-equivariant equivalence of spaces

π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(𝔻1Γ—M,βˆ‚π”»1Γ—M)≃𝔻iΓ—π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)/βˆ‚π”»iΓ—π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)≃Σiβ€‹π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(M)\conf_{i}(\mathbb{D}^{1}\times M,\partial\mathbb{D}^{1}\times M)\simeq\mathbb{D}^{i}\times\conf_{i}(M)\big/\partial\mathbb{D}^{i}\times\conf_{i}(M)\simeq\Sigma^{i}\conf_{i}(M)

in the case M=ℝnβˆ’1M=\mathbb{R}^{n-1}. The third equivalence is a coproduct of a composite of two equivalences: Ξ£i​XβŠ—VβŠ—i≃XβŠ—Ξ£i​(VβŠ—i)≃XβŠ—(Σ​V)βŠ—i\Sigma^{i}X\otimes V^{\otimes i}\simeq X\otimes\Sigma^{i}(V^{\otimes i})\simeq X\otimes(\Sigma V)^{\otimes i}. The first of these equivalences uses that tensoring with spaces preserves colimits among spaces – an assertion which is direct from definitions. The second of these equivalences directly uses the assumption that the symmetric monoidal structure of 𝒱\mathcal{V} distributes over colimits.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6