ScalingStacks

0N5G

Proof. Via Example 3.10, each augmented associative algebra A→𝟙A\to\uno in 𝒱\mathcal{V} determines a symmetric monoidal functor A:𝒟​𝗂𝗌𝗄𝟣∂,𝗈𝗋→𝒱A\colon\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{1}\to\mathcal{V}. Applying ⊗\otimes-excision in this simplest case of the collar-gluing [−1,1)⋃(−1,1)(−1,1]≅[−1,1][-1,1)\underset{(-1,1)}{\bigcup}(-1,1]\cong[-1,1], we have that the bar construction 𝖡𝖺𝗋⁡(A){\sf Bar}(A) is identifiable as the factorization homology over the closed 1-disk:

𝖡𝖺𝗋⁡(A)≃∫𝔻1A.{\sf Bar}(A)~\simeq~\int_{\mathbb{D}^{1}}A~.

Proposition 5.5 gives the first and last of the following identifications

∫𝔻1×ℝn−1​𝖥𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇​(𝖵)\displaystyle\underset{\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1}}{\int}\free_{n}(V) ≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐i≥0𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(𝔻1×ℝn−1,∂𝔻1×ℝn−1)​⊗Σi​V⊗i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1},\partial\mathbb{D}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐i≥0Σi​𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(ℝn−1)​⊗Σi​V⊗i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\Sigma^{i}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq ∐i≥0𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(ℝn−1)​⊗Σi​(Σ​V)⊗i\displaystyle\coprod_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}(\Sigma V)^{\otimes i}
≃\displaystyle\simeq 𝖥𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇−𝟣⁡(Σ​𝖵).\displaystyle\free_{n-1}(\Sigma V)~.

The second identification follows from the Σi\Sigma_{i}-equivariant equivalence of spaces

𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(𝔻1×M,∂𝔻1×M)≃𝔻i×𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(M)/∂𝔻i×𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(M)≃Σi​𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿i⁡(M)\conf_{i}(\mathbb{D}^{1}\times M,\partial\mathbb{D}^{1}\times M)\simeq\mathbb{D}^{i}\times\conf_{i}(M)\big/\partial\mathbb{D}^{i}\times\conf_{i}(M)\simeq\Sigma^{i}\conf_{i}(M)

in the case M=ℝn−1M=\mathbb{R}^{n-1}. The third equivalence is a coproduct of a composite of two equivalences: Σi​X⊗V⊗i≃X⊗Σi​(V⊗i)≃X⊗(Σ​V)⊗i\Sigma^{i}X\otimes V^{\otimes i}\simeq X\otimes\Sigma^{i}(V^{\otimes i})\simeq X\otimes(\Sigma V)^{\otimes i}. The first of these equivalences uses that tensoring with spaces preserves colimits among spaces – an assertion which is direct from definitions. The second of these equivalences directly uses the assumption that the symmetric monoidal structure of 𝒱\mathcal{V} distributes over colimits.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6