ScalingStacks

0N4F

Proposition 3.23. Let MM be a BB-framed nn-manifold, NN an oriented kk-manifold, possibly with boundary, and f:Mβ†’Nf:M\rightarrow N a map which fibers over the interior and boundary of NN. For AA a BB-framed nn-disk algebra in 𝒱\mathcal{V}, a symmetric monoidal ∞\oo-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable, then the canonical morphism in 𝒱\mathcal{V}

∫Nfβˆ—β€‹Aβ†’β‰ƒβˆ«MA\int_{N}f_{\ast}A\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}\int_{M}A

is an equivalence.

0N4G

Proof. After PropositionΒ 3.9, we can assume that BB is equivalent to π–‘π–³π—ˆπ—‰β‘(𝗇)\BTop(n), and so we omit it from the notation and discussion. We will explain the string of canonical equivalences in 𝒱\mathcal{V}:

∫Nfβˆ—β€‹A\displaystyle\int_{N}f_{\ast}A ≃Def​3.2\displaystyle\underset{\rm Def~\ref{coend}}{\simeq} π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹π–Ώβˆ—β€‹π– β€‹(𝖴)\displaystyle\colim_{U\in\disk_{k/N}^{\partial,{\sf or}}}f_{\ast}A(U)
≃Def​fβˆ—\displaystyle\underset{{\rm Def~}f_{\ast}}{\simeq} π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹βˆ«π–Ώβˆ’πŸ£β€‹π–΄π– \displaystyle\colim_{U\in\disk_{k/N}^{\partial,{\sf or}}}\int_{f^{-1}U}A
≃Def​3.2\displaystyle\underset{\rm Def~\ref{coend}}{\simeq} π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΄βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΅βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–Ώβˆ’πŸ£β€‹π–΄β€‹π– β€‹(𝖡)\displaystyle\colim_{U\in\disk_{k/N}^{\partial,{\sf or}}}\colim_{V\in\disk_{n/f^{-1}U}}A(V)
≃(1)\displaystyle\underset{(1)}{\simeq} π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†(𝖴,𝖡)βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π–Ώπ– β€‹(𝖡)\displaystyle\colim_{(U,V)\in\disk_{f}}A(V)
β†’(2)≃\displaystyle\underset{(2)}{\xrightarrow{\simeq}} π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΅βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬𝖠​(𝖡)\displaystyle\colim_{V\in\disk_{n/M}}A(V)
≃Def​3.2\displaystyle\underset{\rm Def~\ref{coend}}{\simeq} ∫MA.\displaystyle\int_{M}A~.

The only equivalences that are not definitional areΒ (1) andΒ (2). The equivalenceΒ (2) is a direct application of LemmaΒ 3.21, which states that the functor 𝖾𝗏0:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π–Ώβ†’π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬{\sf ev}_{0}\colon\disk_{f}\to\disk_{n/M} is final. Consider the left Kan extension (non-commutative) diagram among ∞\infty-categories:

π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π–Ώ\textstyle{\disk_{f}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝖾𝗏1\scriptstyle{{\sf ev}_{1}}𝖾𝗏0\scriptstyle{{\sf ev}_{0}}π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/𝖬\textstyle{\disk_{n/M}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡\textstyle{\disk_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}A\scriptstyle{A}𝒱\textstyle{\mathcal{V}}π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹\textstyle{\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{k/N}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝖫π–ͺ𝖺𝗇\scriptstyle{\sf LKan},

which exists because 𝒱\mathcal{V} is presentable. By construction, the functor 𝖾𝗏1:π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π–Ώβ†’π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹{\sf ev}_{1}\colon\disk_{f}\to\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{k/N} is a coCartesian fibration. In particular, for each object Uβˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹U\in\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{k/N}, the inclusion of the fiber into the over ∞\infty-category

𝖾𝗏1βˆ’1​(U)⟢(π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π–Ώ)/𝖴{\sf ev}_{1}^{-1}(U)\longrightarrow(\disk_{f})_{/U}

is final. Therefore, the value of 𝖫π–ͺ𝖺𝗇{\sf LKan} on Uβˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—„/π–­βˆ‚,π—ˆπ—‹U\in\disk^{\partial,\sf or}_{k/N} is the colimit over the fiber:

π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΅βˆˆπ’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡/π–Ώβˆ’πŸ£β€‹π–΄π– β€‹(𝖡)​≃Def​3.20β€‹π–Όπ—ˆπ—…π—‚π—†π–΅βˆˆπ–Ύπ—πŸ£βˆ’πŸ£β€‹π–΄π– β€‹(𝖡)→≃𝖫π–ͺ𝖺𝗇⁑(𝖴).\colim_{V\in\disk_{n/f^{-1}U}}A(V)~\underset{\rm Def~\ref{disk-f}}{\simeq}~\colim_{V\in{\sf ev}_{1}^{-1}U}A(V)\xrightarrow{~\simeq~}{\sf LKan}(U)~.

So the colimit of 𝖫π–ͺ𝖺𝗇{\sf LKan} is the codomain ofΒ (1). The equivalenceΒ (1) follows from PropositionΒ 4.3.3.7 ofΒ [Lu1], which implies the colimit of a left Kan extension agrees with the colimit because they both satisfy the same universal property.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6