ScalingStacks

[05X8]

Remark 2.2.8. Observe that by 2.2.4, the projection 𝐎𝐩∞,∗red→𝐎𝐩∞red\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\to\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} is an equivalence. Hence, the inclusion 𝐎𝐩∞red↪𝐎𝐩∞un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} induces a functor

𝐎𝐩∞red≃𝐎𝐩∞,∗red↪𝐎𝐩∞,∗un.\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\simeq\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}}\hookrightarrow\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}.

Moreover, it exhibits 𝐎𝐩∞red\mathbf{Op}_{\infty}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{red}}} as the full subcategory of 𝐎𝐩∞,∗un\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}} spanned by the reduced objects with respect to the underlying ∞\infty-category functor (−)¯:𝐎𝐩∞,∗un→𝐂𝐚𝐭∞\underline{\left(-\right)}\colon\mathbf{Op}_{\infty,*}^{\operatorname{\scriptsize{un}}}\to\mathbf{Cat}_{\infty} in the sense of 2.1.4. Thus, the two notions of “reduced ∞\infty-operad” coincide.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source page 12

Original source · 1808.06006v3