ScalingStacks

[05Y4]

Lemma 3.2.4. Let fΞ±:π’Ÿβ†’π’žΞ±f_{\alpha}\colon\mathcal{D}\to\mathcal{C}_{\alpha} be a collection of jointly conservative, symmetric monoidal functors between symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-categories.

  1. (1)

    If π’žΞ±\mathcal{C}_{\alpha} is Cartesian and fΞ±f_{\alpha} preserves finite products for all Ξ±\alpha and π’ŸΒ―\underline{\mathcal{D}} has all finite products, then π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} is Cartesian.

  2. (2)

    If π’žΞ±\mathcal{C}_{\alpha} is coCartesian and fΞ±f_{\alpha} preserves finite coproducts for all Ξ±\alpha and π’ŸΒ―\underline{\mathcal{D}} has all finite coproducts, then π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} is coCartesian.

[05Y5]

Proof. By A.2.4.2.7, the opposite of a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category acquires a symmetric monoidal structure, which is Cartesian if and only if the original symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category is coCartesian. Hence, it is enough to prove (2). The unit object 1βˆˆπ’Ÿ1\in\mathcal{D} has a unique map from the initial object βˆ…β†’1\varnothing\to 1. Since fΞ±f_{\alpha} is both symmetric monoidal and preserves finite coproducts, fα​(βˆ…β†’1)f_{\alpha}\left(\varnothing\to 1\right) is the unique map from the initial object to the unit object of π’žΞ±\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}, which is an equivalence by assumption. Since the collection of fΞ±f_{\alpha} is jointly conservative, it follows that the unit of π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} is initial in π’ŸΒ―\underline{\mathcal{D}} as well. Namely, π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} is unital as an ∞\infty-operad. Using 2.2.3 we have a map of ∞\infty-operads G:π’Ÿβ†’π’ŸβŠ”G\colon\mathcal{D}\to\mathcal{D}_{\sqcup}, which is an equivalence on the underlying ∞\infty-categories. We need to show that this map is symmetric monoidal. Namely, that it maps coCartesian edges (over π…π’π§βˆ—\mathbf{Fin}_{*}) to coCartesian edges. Since we already know that it is a map of ∞\infty-operads and hence preserves inert morphisms, we only need to show that active coCartesian edges map to coCartesian edges. Using the Segal conditions, we are further reduced to considering only coCartesian lifts of the unique active morphism ΞΌ:⟨nβŸ©β†’βŸ¨1⟩\mu\colon\left\langle n\right\rangle\to\left\langle 1\right\rangle. For every collection of objects X1,X2,…,Xnβˆˆπ’ŸΒ―X_{1},X_{2},\dots,X_{n}\in\underline{\mathcal{D}}, let

ΞΌβŠ—:X1βŠ•β‹―βŠ•Xnβ†’X1βŠ—X2βŠ—β‹―βŠ—Xn\mu_{\otimes}\colon X_{1}\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{n}\to X_{1}\otimes X_{2}\otimes\dots\otimes X_{n}

be a coCartesian lift of ΞΌ\mu to π’ŸβŠ—\mathcal{D}^{\otimes}. Since GG is an equivalence on the underlying ∞\infty-categories, G⁑(ΞΌβŠ—)G\left(\mu_{\otimes}\right) can be considered as a map

X1βŠ•β‹―βŠ•Xnβ†’X1βŠ—X2βŠ—β‹―βŠ—XnX_{1}\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{n}\to X_{1}\otimes X_{2}\otimes\dots\otimes X_{n}

in π’ŸβŠ”\mathcal{D}_{\sqcup}. Now, let

ΞΌβŠ”:X1βŠ•β‹―βŠ•Xnβ†’X1βŠ”X2βŠ”β‹―βŠ”Xn\mu_{\sqcup}\colon X_{1}\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{n}\to X_{1}\sqcup X_{2}\sqcup\dots\sqcup X_{n}

be a coCartesian lift of ΞΌ\mu to π’ŸβŠ”\mathcal{D}^{\sqcup}. There exists a unique (up to homotopy) map

gX1,…,Xn:X1βŠ”X2βŠ”β‹―βŠ”Xnβ†’X1βŠ—X2βŠ—β‹―βŠ—Xn,g_{X_{1},\dots,X_{n}}\colon X_{1}\sqcup X_{2}\sqcup\dots\sqcup X_{n}\to X_{1}\otimes X_{2}\otimes\dots\otimes X_{n},

such that G⁑(ΞΌβŠ—)=gX1,…,Xnβˆ˜ΞΌβŠ”G\left(\mu_{\otimes}\right)=g_{X_{1},\dots,X_{n}}\circ\mu_{\sqcup}. We need to show that gX1,…,Xng_{X_{1},\dots,X_{n}} is an equivalence in π’ŸΒ―\underline{\mathcal{D}} for all X1,…,Xnβˆˆπ’ŸΒ―X_{1},\dots,X_{n}\in\underline{\mathcal{D}}. For every Ξ±\alpha, we have a homotopy commutative diagram

π’ŸβŠ—\textstyle{\mathcal{D}^{\otimes}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}fΞ±\scriptstyle{f_{\alpha}}π’ŸβŠ”\textstyle{\mathcal{D}^{\sqcup}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}fΞ±\scriptstyle{f_{\alpha}}π’žΞ±βŠ—\textstyle{\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}^{\otimes}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}π’žΞ±βŠ”\textstyle{\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}^{\sqcup}}

in which the vertical and bottom maps are symmetric monoidal. It follows that fα​(gX1,…,Xn)f_{\alpha}\left(g_{X_{1},\dots,X_{n}}\right) is an equivalence in π’žΞ±\mathcal{C}_{\alpha} for all Ξ±\alpha. By joint conservativity, gX1,…,Xng_{X_{1},\dots,X_{n}} is an equivalence as well. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source page 21

Original source Β· 1808.06006v3