ScalingStacks

[05XV]

Proposition 2.4.6. Let g:𝒫→𝒬g\colon\mathcal{P}\to\mathcal{Q} be a map of reduced ∞\infty-operads and let π’ž\mathcal{C} be a presentably symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category. For every object Xβˆˆπ’žX\in\mathcal{C}, the induced map of the associated monads

T𝒫​(X)=colimπ’«π’π’πžπͺ​(X)β†’colimπ’¬π’π’πžπͺ​(X)=T𝒬​(X)T_{\mathcal{P}}\left(X\right)=\operatorname*{colim}\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(X\right)\to\operatorname*{colim}\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(X\right)=T_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right)

is equivalent to the canonical map on colimits that is induced by pre-composition with

gπ’π’πžπͺ:π’«π’π’πžπͺβ†’π’¬π’π’πžπͺ.g_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\colon\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\to\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}.
[05XW]

Proof. We denote by G:Alg¯𝒬​(π’ž)β†’Alg¯𝒫​(π’ž)G\colon\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right)\to\underline{\operatorname{Alg}}_{\mathcal{P}}\left(\mathcal{C}\right) the forgetful functor induced by the map gg. Let

f:Xβ†’U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)≃U𝒫​G​F𝒬​(X)f\colon X\to U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right)\simeq U_{\mathcal{P}}GF_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right)

be the unit map. It induces a cone diagram

π’«π’π’πžπͺ​(f):π’«π’π’πžπͺβ†’π’ž/U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(f\right)\colon\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\to\mathcal{\mathcal{C}}_{/U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right)}

and, by 2.4.5, the associated map f~:U𝒫​F𝒫​(X)β†’U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)\tilde{f}\colon U_{\mathcal{P}}F_{\mathcal{P}}\left(X\right)\to U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right) is equivalent to the map colimπ’«π’π’πžπͺ​(X)β†’U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)\operatorname*{colim}\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(X\right)\to U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right) specified by the cone diagram π’«π’π’πžπͺ​(f)\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(f\right). On the other hand, inspecting Construction A.3.1.3.1, it can be seen that the diagram π’«π’π’πžπͺ​(f)\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(f\right) is obtained from the diagram

π’¬π’π’πžπͺ​(f):π’¬π’π’πžπͺβ†’π’ž/U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(f\right)\colon\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\to\mathcal{\mathcal{C}}_{/U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right)}

by pre-composition with gπ’π’πžπͺ:π’«π’π’πžπͺβ†’π’¬π’π’πžπͺg_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\colon\mathcal{P}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\to\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}} and that π’¬π’π’πžπͺ​(f)\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(f\right) exhibits U𝒬​F𝒬​(X)U_{\mathcal{Q}}F_{\mathcal{Q}}\left(X\right) as the colimit of π’¬π’π’πžπͺ​(X)\mathcal{Q}_{\mathbf{SSeq}}\left(X\right). Thus, we get the desired equivalence. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1808.06006v3

Original source page 18

Original source Β· 1808.06006v3