Proof. We denote by
the forgetful functor induced by the map . Let
|
|
|
be the unit map. It induces a cone diagram
|
|
|
and, by 2.4.5, the associated map
is equivalent to the map
specified by the cone diagram .
On the other hand, inspecting Construction A.3.1.3.1, it can be seen that the diagram
is obtained from the diagram
|
|
|
by pre-composition with
and that exhibits
as the colimit of . Thus, we get
the desired equivalence.
β