Let us now specialize the addition of 3-handles to the case where the initial
manifold is a union of -, - and 2-handles. We will then have available to
us the description of from Section 3.1.
If we attach a 3-handle to , in terms of Kirby calculus, the attaching
sphere can be represented as a surface (of genus , and disjoint
from ) with boundary some copies of the ’s (the attaching circles for
2-handles). Then is the union of and (parallel copies of) cores
of the 2-handles.
We draw as a small unknot away from all , and let
be the small disk it bounds. The other hemisphere is the complement
of in , and goes over some of the handles. We let
This is a surface
on whose boundary is the union of and several copies of the
’s. Let be the number of copies of in that
appear with the negative orientation, and the number of those with the
positive orientation. We form the vectors
We proceed to describe the maps and
in this case. By Theorem 3.2
with notation as in (10), the range of these
maps is identified with the direct sum of cabled skein lasagna modules .
Similarly, their domain is identified with
We used here the fact that is split disjoint from all
the attaching links for the 2-handles, and therefore each summand that appears
in the definition of splits off a factor;
moreover, the equivalence relation is compatible with this splitting.
The map is now easy to describe. It is
induced by capping with a disk, so it only affects the factor , in
a standard way. Precisely, we have
(11)
for all .
To describe the second map , consider the
diagram
(12)
Here, in the top row we wrote for a pair
as in Definition 3.1. The vertical maps from the first to the
second row are induced by the inclusion of the summands into the cabled skein
lasagna module; cf. Definition 3.1. The vertical maps from the
second to the third row are the isomorphisms from Theorem 3.2.
Ignoring the middle dashed arrow for the moment, note that the above diagram
commutes. Indeed, by the definition of in the proof of
Theorem 3.2, the vertical compositions (from the first to the third
row) are given by attaching cores of the 2-handles to lasagna fillings in .
Note that we are attaching more cores on the right; namely, those in the
boundary of , counted by the vectors and . The
horizontal cobordism maps (as defined in Section 2.2) are given by
attaching the surface (in the top row) and (in the bottom
row). Because is the union of and the extra cores of
2-handles counted by and , the diagram (12)
commutes.
Since the bottom vertical arrows in the diagram are isomorphisms, let us now add
the middle dashed arrow, given by the map
Because (12) commutes, we
deduce that this map is induced on the skein lasagna modules by applying the
cobordism maps on each summand; this
justifies the notation.
Recall that is the complement of the disk inside .
Thus, we can write the cobordism maps
in terms of the maps
associated to the surface with dots, as in (7):
Fixing , the maps on
various summands in the construction of the skein lasagna module induce a map:
such that
(13)
We are now ready to give a general formula for the skein lasagna module of a
four-manifold decomposed into handles in terms of skein lasagna modules of
1-handlebodies. We will phrase it for an arbitrary number of handles.
is obtained from by attaching two-handles along a framed link
;
•
is obtained from by attaching three-handles along spheres
;
•
is obtained from by attaching some four-handles.
Consider also a framed link . We represent by a Kirby
diagram, viewing as a link in , and the spheres in
terms of surfaces on with consisting of some
copies of various components of (so that is the union of
and the corresponding cores of the 2-handles).
Given
let be the set of all whose equivalence class modulo is .
Then, the skein lasagna module is isomorphic to the
quotient of the direct sum of cabled skein lasagna modules by the relations
Proof.First, note that the addition of 4-handles does not affect the skein lasagna
module, in view of Proposition 3.4. Thus, we can consider
instead of .
The skein lasagna module of viewed in the boundary of is given by
according to Theorem 3.2. When we add a 3-handle, we
divide by the relations
(16)
as proved in Theorem 3.7. In terms of the identifications from
Theorem 3.2, the left hand side of (16) is given by
Equation (11), and the right hand side by
Equation (13). We thus get relations of the form (14)
and (15). The generalization to multiple 3-handles is
straightforward.
∎
Theorem 3.10 gives a description of an arbitrary skein lasagna module
in terms of skein lasagna modules for links in the boundary of , and cobordism maps for surfaces in . In the next
section we will obtain a further reduction to links in and cobordism maps
between them, under the additional constraint of working with field
coefficients; see Theorem 4.7.