We start by reviewing the construction of skein lasagna modules from [27, Section 5.2].
Following [27] and [25], for a framed link , we
write
for the version of
Khovanov-Rozansky homology. Here, denotes the homological grading and
denotes the quantum grading.
If we have an oriented manifold diffeomorphic to the standard -sphere
, and a framed link , we can define a canonical invariant
as in [27, Definition 4.12]. We sometimes drop from the
notation and simply write .
Given a framed cobordism from to ,
there is an induced map
which is homogeneous of bidegree
.
Let be a four-manifold and a framed link. A lasagna
filling of with boundary consists of
•
A finite collection of disjoint -balls (called input balls)
embedded in the interior or ;
•
A framed oriented surface properly embedded in , meeting in and meeting each in a link
; and
•
for each , a homogeneous label
The bidegree of a lasagna filling is
If is a -ball,
we can define a cobordism map
and
an evaluation
We define the skein lasagna module as the bigraded abelian group
where is the transitive and linear closure of the following
relation:
(a)
Linear combinations of lasagna fillings are set to be multilinear in the
labels ;
(b)
Furthermore, two lasagna fillings and are set to be equivalent
if has an input ball with label , and is obtained from
by replacing with another lasagna filling of a -ball such
that , followed by an isotopy rel (where the isotopy is
allowed to move the input balls):
Lemma 2.1.Let and be as above, and fix balls , one in each
connected component of . Then, the equivalence relation defining
can be alternatively be described as the transitive and linear closure of the
following relation:
•
Linear combinations of lasagna fillings are set to be multilinear in the
labels ;
•
Lasagna fillings that are isotopic rel are set to be equivalent;
•
Two lasagna fillings are also set to be equivalent if they differ as in
(b) above, where the input ball is one of the chosen balls .
Proof.If and are equivalent as in the lemma, let us show that they are
equivalent as in the definition of the skein lasagna module. The only new
relation is the isotopy, which can be thought of as a particular instance of
(b), where is replaced by a slightly smaller ball with the same decoration
(and is a product cobordism).
Conversely, if and are equivalent as in the definition of the skein
lasagna module, we only have to consider the case when they are related by (b).
We can then isotope to turn it into the ball in the same connected
component, and view (b) as a combination of the moves in the lemma.
∎
Skein lasagna modules decompose according to relative homology classes, as noted
in [25, Section 2.3]:
(1)
Observe that in the case where is not null-homologous in (i.e. ), then there are no lasagna fillings, so . When
, consider the boundary map in the long exact sequence of
the pair :
The only classes that can contribute non-trivially are those that map to the fundamental
class under . Let us introduce the notation
Note that, using the
long exact sequence of the pair, the difference of two classes in
can be identified with an element of . Thus, is a
torsor over ; it can be identified with the latter group after
choosing a base element in .