ScalingStacks

4.1. One-handles away from links

We first consider the case when LL is disjoint from the cocores of the 1-handles. Up to a small isotopy, we may even assume that LL is disjoint from the entire boundary of the added 1-handles, i.e. that L⊂∂WL\subset\partial W. As in Proposition 3.4, the corresponding invariants are related by a canonical map and we have:

0NG4

Lemma 4.1. The inclusion i:(W,L)→(W′,L)i\colon(W,L)\to(W^{\prime},L) induces an isomorphism

i∗:𝒮0N​(W,L,𝕜)→≅𝒮0N​(W′,L,𝕜)i_{*}\colon\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L,\mathbbm{k})\xrightarrow{\cong}\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W^{\prime};L,\mathbbm{k})
0NG5

Proof. The proof is a straightforward generalization of the proof of [25, Theorem 1.4], which deals with boundary connected sums. The map i∗i_{*} is induced by the map sending lasagna fillings of (W,L)(W,L) to lasagna fillings of (W′,L)(W^{\prime},L) along the embedding ii. The inverse is given on lasagna fillings FF in (W′,L)(W^{\prime},L) by looking at their intersection with a neighborhood of the cocores of all 1-handles. Up to a small isotopy, each such intersection is an identity cobordism on a link K⊂B3K\subset B^{3}. The inverse map is given by replacing it by a sum of pairs of input balls, labelled by basis and dual basis elements of KhRN⁡(K)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K) respectively. The resulting linear combination of fillings can be isotoped into WW, and is equivalent to the original filling according to the neck-cutting lemma (Lemma 7.2 in [25]). ∎

0NG6

Corollary 4.2. There are canonical isomorphisms

𝕜→≅𝒮0N​(S1×B3,∅,𝕜),𝕜→≅𝒮0N​(S1×S3,𝕜)\mathbbm{k}\xrightarrow{\cong}\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(S^{1}\times B^{3};\emptyset,\mathbbm{k}),\qquad\mathbbm{k}\xrightarrow{\cong}\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(S^{1}\times S^{3},\mathbbm{k})

each sending 1∈𝕜1\in\mathbbm{k} to the respective empty lasagna filling.

0NG7

Proof. The first isomorphism is given by a 1-handle attachment to (B4,∅)(B^{4},\emptyset) as in Lemma 4.1. The second isomorphism can be proved similarly: Let FF be a lasagna filling of S1×S3S^{1}\times S^{3} and consider its intersection with a fiber {x}×S3\{x\}\times S^{3}. Up to a small isotopy, we may assume that the filling FF intersects {x}×S3\{x\}\times S^{3} transversely (in lasagna sheet, not in input balls) and disjointly from {x}×{north pole}\{x\}\times\{\text{north pole}\}. Then for small ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the intersection F∩[x−ϵ,x+ϵ]×(S3∖north pole)F\cap[x-\epsilon,x+\epsilon]\times(S^{3}\setminus\text{north pole}) is an identity cobordism on a link KK. We replace this by a sum over pairs of input balls labelled with basis and dual basis elements of KhRN⁡(K)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K) respectively. The resulting closed lasagna filling is supported in a single B4B^{4} and can, thus, be identified with a scalar multiple of the empty filling. ∎

0NG8

Remark 4.3. It is instructive to evaluate the inverse to the canonical isomorphisms from Corollary 4.2 on surfaces of revolution generated by links. Any framed, oriented link K⊂B3K\subset B^{3} or S3S^{3} defines a vegetarian11 1 A lasagna filling consisting only of a surface, without input meat balls. lasagna filling S1×KS^{1}\times K of S1×B3S^{1}\times B^{3}, which evaluates to a scalar multiple of the empty lasagna filling. It follows from the proofs of Lemma 4.1 and Corollary 4.2 that this scalar is the trace of the identity map on KhRN⁡(K)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K). Here it is important to take the Koszul signs in the symmetric monoidal structure on (homologically and quantum) bigraded vector spaces into account. The trace is thus tr⁡(IdKhRN⁡(K))=χq=1​(KhRN⁡(K))=±N|π0​(K)|\operatorname{tr}(\operatorname{Id}_{\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K)})=\chi_{q=1}(\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K))=\pm N^{|\pi_{0}(K)|} , i.e. the 𝔤​𝔩N\mathfrak{gl}_{N} quantum link polynomial of KK, specialized at q=1q=1. More generally, any endocobordism of KK defines a lasagna filling of S1×B3S^{1}\times B^{3} that is a multiple of the empty filling, with coefficient given by the graded trace of the induced endomorphism of KhRN⁡(K)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(K); see e.g. [16, Section 6], [3, Section 10.1], [7, Theorem D] for related discussions of Lefschetz traces in the case of Khovanov homology.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Ciprian Manolescu, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2206.04616v2