ScalingStacks

0NG3

Proof. First, note that the addition of 4-handles does not affect the skein lasagna module, in view of Proposition 3.4. Thus, we can consider W3W_{3} instead of W4W_{4}.

The skein lasagna module of LL viewed in the boundary of ∂W\partial W is given by 𝒮¯0N,α​(W1,K,L)\underline{\mathcal{S}\mkern-3.0mu}\mkern 3.0mu_{0}^{N,\alpha}(W_{1};K,L) according to Theorem 3.2. When we add a 3-handle, we divide by the relations

(16) ΨI×Y;Δ+,α′​(v⊗Xn)=ΨI×Y;Δ−,α′​(v⊗Xn),\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{+},\alpha^{\prime}}(v\otimes X^{n})=\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{-},\alpha^{\prime}}(v\otimes X^{n}),

as proved in Theorem 3.7. In terms of the identifications Φ\Phi from Theorem 3.2, the left hand side of (16) is given by Equation (11), and the right hand side by Equation (13). We thus get relations of the form (14) and (15). The generalization to multiple 3-handles is straightforward. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Ciprian Manolescu, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2206.04616v2