ScalingStacks

1. Introduction

Homological invariants such as Khovanov homology [17] and Khovanov-Rozansky homology [21] are at the center of modern knot theory. These invariants were originally defined for links in ℝ3{\mathbb{R}}^{3}. Extending them to links in arbitrary 33-manifolds is a problem that garnered much attention recently, from various perspectives (categorification at roots of unity [20, 9, 28], theoretical physics [34, 14, 13], etc.)

One such extension was introduced in [27], based on higher category theory and using the concept of blob homology [26]. Given a smooth, oriented, compact four-manifold WW and a framed oriented link LL in the boundary ∂W\partial W, the construction in [27] associates to the pair (W,L)(W,L) a homology theory graded by ℤ3×H2​(W,L,ℤ){\mathbb{Z}}^{3}\times H_{2}(W,L;{\mathbb{Z}}) and denoted 𝒮∗N​(W,L)\mathcal{S}^{N}_{*}(W;L). One of the three integer gradings is called the blob degree, and for our purposes we will focus on the theory in blob degree zero, 𝒮0N​(W,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W,L). This is called the skein lasagna module of (W,L)(W,L) and has a relatively simple definition, reminiscent of the definition of the skein module of a 33-manifold. The skein lasagna module is defined as the span of the lasagna fillings of WW with boundary LL, modulo an equivalence relation. The lasagna fillings are certain decorated surfaces connecting LL to other links in the boundaries of 44-balls inside WW, and the equivalences come from cobordism maps in Khovanov-Rozansky homology.

Skein lasagna modules are challenging to compute. It was proved in [27] that when W=B4W=B^{4}, the invariant 𝒮0N​(B4,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(B^{4};L) coincides with the Khovanov-Rozansky homology of the link LL. Further computational methods were developed in [25], with a focus on 2-handlebodies (four-manifolds obtained from B4B^{4} by attaching 2-handles). This allowed the calculation of the skein lasagna modules (in some gradings) for four-manifolds such as the complex projective plane, and disk bundles over S2S^{2}.

In this paper, building on the work in [27] and [25], we give a new formula for the skein lasagna module of a link in the boundary of an arbitrary four-manifold. We start by choosing a handle decomposition for the four-manifold. For simplicity, we may assume that we have a single 0-handle. We then study how the skein lasagna module changes under adding handles. Disjoint unions, 4-handles and many cases of 2-handles were already studied in [25], so the main thing left is to understand 1- and 3-handles.

With regard to 3-handles, we have the following:

0NFI

Theorem 1.1. Suppose that we have a four-manifold WW with boundary YY, and let W′W^{\prime} be the result of attaching a 3-handle to WW along a sphere S⊂YS\subset Y. Let also LL be a framed link in YY disjoint from SS, and L′L^{\prime} the corresponding link in ∂W′\partial W^{\prime}. The equator JJ of SS splits the sphere into two hemispheres, each of which induces a cobordism map from 𝒮0N​(W,L∪J)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L\cup J) to 𝒮0N​(W,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L). Then, the skein lasagna module 𝒮0N​(W′,L′)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W^{\prime};L^{\prime}) is isomorphic to the coequalizer of these two cobordism maps. (See Theorem 3.7 for a more precise statement.)

Next, we combine Theorem 1.1 with the treatment of 2-handles in [25] to get a general result, reducing the calculation of the skein lasagna module to the case of 1-handles.

Recall that in [25], the skein lasagna module of a 2-handlebody was shown to be isomorphic to the so-called cabled Khovanov-Rozansky of the attaching link for the 2-handles; this is obtained from the Khovanov-Rozansky homologies of the cables of this attaching link, modulo certain cobordism relations. We define an analogue of the cabled Khovanov-Rozansky homology for two links K,LK,L in the boundary of W1=♮m​(S1×B3)W_{1}=\natural^{m}(S^{1}\times B^{3}) (and, more generally, any other four-manifold); we call this the cabled skein lasagna module 𝒮¯0N​(W1,K,L)\underline{\mathcal{S}\mkern-3.0mu}\mkern 3.0mu_{0}^{N}(W_{1};K,L).

0NFJ

Theorem 1.2. Consider four-manifolds W1⊆W2⊆W3⊆W4W_{1}\subseteq W_{2}\subseteq W_{3}\subseteq W_{4} where

  • •

    W1=♮m​(S1×B3)W_{1}=\natural^{m}(S^{1}\times B^{3}) is the union of mm one-handles;

  • •

    W2W_{2} is obtained from W1W_{1} by attaching nn two-handles along a framed link KK;

  • •

    W3W_{3} is obtained from W2W_{2} by attaching pp three-handles along spheres S1,…​SpS_{1},\dots S_{p};

  • •

    W4W_{4} be obtained from W3W_{3} by attaching some four-handles.

Consider also a framed link L⊂∂W4L\subset\partial W_{4}, and view K∪LK\cup L as a link in ∂W1\partial W_{1}. Then, the skein lasagna module 𝒮0N​(W4,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W_{4};L) is isomorphic to the quotient of the cabled skein lasagna module 𝒮¯0N​(W1,K,L)\underline{\mathcal{S}\mkern-3.0mu}\mkern 3.0mu_{0}^{N}(W_{1};K,L) by coequalizing relations coming from the 3-handles as in Theorem 1.1. (See Theorem 3.10 for a more precise statement.)

The cabled skein lasagna module 𝒮¯0N​(W1,K,L)\underline{\mathcal{S}\mkern-3.0mu}\mkern 3.0mu_{0}^{N}(W_{1};K,L) is constructed from the invariants 𝒮0N​(W1,K⁡(a,b)∪L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W_{1};K(a,b)\cup L) where K⁡(a,b)∪LK(a,b)\cup L is a family of framed links in ∂W1=#m​(S1×S2)\partial W_{1}=\#^{m}(S^{1}\times S^{2}) consisting of LL and cables K⁡(a,b)K(a,b) of the attaching link KK for the 2-handles. Thus, Theorem 1.2 allows us to express 𝒮0N​(W4,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W_{4};L) in terms of skein lasagna modules of links in ∂W1\partial W_{1} (and maps between them).

The second half of our paper studies in more detail the skein lasagna modules for links in ∂W1\partial W_{1} where W1=♮m​(S1×B3)W_{1}=\natural^{m}(S^{1}\times B^{3}). We work with coefficients in a field 𝕜\mathbbm{k}. By cutting along the cocores of the 1-handles, we reduce the problem of computing 𝒮0N​(W1,L,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W_{1};L,\mathbbm{k}) to a problem about skein lasagna modules for the (boundary of the) 0-handle B4B^{4} with a family of framed links related to LL. For links in B4B^{4}, the invariant 𝒮0N\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N} is simply the Khovanov-Rozansky homology KhRN\operatorname{KhR}_{N}.

0NFK

Theorem 1.3. Let W1=♮m​(S1×B3)W_{1}=\natural^{m}(S^{1}\times B^{3}) with a nullhomologous link L⊂∂W1L\subset\partial W_{1} in the boundary that intersects the belt spheres of the 1-handles transversely in 2​pi2p_{i} points for 1≤i≤m1\leq i\leq m. Let R⊂S3∖⨆i(Bi∪Bi¯)R\subset S^{3}\setminus\bigsqcup_{i}(B_{i}\cup\overline{B_{i}}) denote the tangle obtained from LL by cutting open along the belt spheres. Then, the skein lasagna module 𝒮0N​(W1,L,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W_{1};L,\mathbbm{k}) is isomorphic to the quotient

⨁tangles​Ti|∂Ti|=2​piKhRN(R∪⨆i(Ti⊔Ti¯),𝕜){(∑ipi)(N−1)}/∼\bigoplus_{\begin{subarray}{c}\mathrm{tangles}~T_{i}\\ |\partial T_{i}|=2p_{i}\end{subarray}}\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(R\cup\bigsqcup_{i}(T_{i}\sqcup\overline{T_{i}}),\mathbbm{k})\{(\textstyle\sum_{i}p_{i})(N-1)\}\big/\sim

where {⋅}\{\cdot\} denotes a grading shift, and the relation ∼\sim is given by taking coinvariants for the actions of certain categories 𝒮0N​(B3,Ppi)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(B^{3};P_{p_{i}}) associated to the configurations PpiP_{p_{i}} of pip_{i} positively oriented and pip_{i} negatively oriented points in S2=∂B3S^{2}=\partial B^{3}. (See Theorem 4.7 for a more precise statement.)

Furthermore, we will show that the isomorphisms from Theorem 1.3 are functorial in the following sense: They allow an expression of maps associated to cobordisms S⊂∂W1×IS\subset\partial W_{1}\times I between links S:L→L′S\colon L\to L^{\prime} in ∂W1=#m​(S1×S2)\partial W_{1}=\#^{m}(S^{1}\times S^{2}) in terms of components computed entirely from maps associated to link cobordisms in S3S^{3}.

By combining Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 (plus the functoriality statement), we thus obtain a recipe for expressing the lasagna skein modules of any four-manifold in terms of Khovanov–Rozansky homologies of links in S3S^{3} and maps associated to cobordisms in S3×IS^{3}\times I. The invariant is a quotient of a (typically infinite) direct sum of homologies of links by a subspace defined in terms of link cobordism maps.

0NFL

Remark 1.4. Although the invariant 𝒮0N​(W,L,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L,\mathbbm{k}) for any four-manifold WW can be expressed purely in terms of link homology in S3S^{3}, specifically KhRN\operatorname{KhR}_{N}, it would be difficult to prove directly that these expressions yield a four-manifold invariant. A direct proof of invariance, without comparing to the intrinsically defined invariants 𝒮0N\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}, would require checking handle slide and handle cancellation moves as well as higher coherence conditions between their composites. Handle slides for 2-handles are studied (for N=2N=2) in [15] and instances of (2,3)(2,3)-handle cancellation are discussed in Example 3.8. Another interesting question concerns the behaviour of our algebraic decription of 𝒮0N​(W,L,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L,\mathbbm{k}) under reversing the handle decomposition of WW. However, our approach uses transversality arguments to isotope skeins away from cocores of handles to yield simplified handle formulas; hence, we do not expect these formulas to reflect the duality between kk- and (4−k)(4-k)-handles, because the duality does not respect cocores.

Specializing the setting of Theorem 1.3 to the case of a single 1-handle, we consider the link S1×Pp⊂S1×B3S^{1}\times P_{p}\subset S^{1}\times B^{3} consisting of 2​p2p parallel circles, with pp of them oriented one way and pp the other way. We prove that 𝒮0N​(S1×B3,S1×Pp)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(S^{1}\times B^{3},S^{1}\times P_{p}) is isomorphic to the zeroth Hochschild homology of the category 𝒮0N​(B3,Ppi)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(B^{3};P_{p_{i}}). From here we get the following explicit calculation for N=2N=2.

0NFM

Theorem 1.5. The skein lasagna module 𝒮02​(S1×B3,S1×Pp,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{2}(S^{1}\times B^{3};S^{1}\times P_{p},\mathbbm{k}) is

  1. (a)

    one-dimensional when p=0p=0;

  2. (b)

    four-dimensional when p=1p=1;

  3. (c)

    infinite dimensional when p≥2p\geq 2.

Using methods analogous to those employed in part (a), we also show that 𝒮02​(S1×S3,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{2}(S^{1}\times S^{3},\mathbbm{k}) is one-dimensional; see Corollary 4.2. For part (c), we actually show that 𝒮02​(S1×B3,S1×Pp,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{2}(S^{1}\times B^{3},S^{1}\times P_{p},\mathbbm{k}) is infinite dimensional in bidegree (0,0)(0,0). This answers in the negative Question 1.7 from [25], about whether skein lasagna modules are always locally finite dimensional, i.e., finite dimensional in each fixed bidegree and homology class.

This still leaves open the following:

0NFN

Question 1.6. If WW is simply connected, is 𝒮0N​(W,L,𝕜)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;L,\mathbbm{k}) always locally finite dimensional?

For W1=♮m​(S1×B3)W_{1}=\natural^{m}(S^{1}\times B^{3}), one can view the skein lasagna module 𝒮02​(W1,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{2}(W_{1};L) as a variant of Khovanov homology for links LL in #m​(S1×S2)\#^{m}(S^{1}\times S^{2}). Another version of Khovanov homology for these links was constructed by Rozansky (for m=1m=1) in [31], and Willis [33] for arbitrary mm. The Rozansky–Willis homology HRW∗,∗​(L)H^{*,*}_{\operatorname{RW}}(L) is finitely generated in each bidegree and, thus, different from our theory. We expect that HRW∗,∗​(L)H^{*,*}_{\operatorname{RW}}(L) appears on the E2E_{2} page of a spectral sequence converging to 𝒮02​(W1,L)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{2}(W_{1};L). See Section 4.6 for a further discussion and Section 4.7 for a conjectural extension of the Rozansky–Willis homology to links in the boundary of other four-manifolds.

Organization of the paper. In Section 2 we go over a few preliminaries about skein lasagna modules and Kirby diagrams. In Section 3 we study the behavior of skein lasagna modules under attaching 2- and 3-handles, proving Theorems 1.1 and  1.2. In Section 4 we focus on 1-handles, and prove Theorems 1.3 and  1.5.

Conventions. All the manifolds considered in this paper will be smooth, compact, and oriented. All links and surfaces are oriented and normally framed.

Acknowledgements. This paper builds on previous joint work and many enlightening conversations of KW and PW with Scott Morrison, without which this paper probably would not exist. We would also like to thank Matthew Hogancamp and Ikshu Neithalath for helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Ciprian Manolescu, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2206.04616v2