ScalingStacks

0N53

Proposition 5.1. The following diagram among ∞\infty-categories commutes:

ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nBΓ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\mfld^{B}_{n}\times\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}U×𝗂𝖽\scriptstyle{U\times{\sf id}}𝗂𝖽×fgt\scriptstyle{{\sf id}\times{\rm fgt}}π–²π—‰π–Ίπ–Όπ–Ύπ—ŒΓ—π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\Space\times\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}βŠ—\scriptstyle{\otimes}π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nBΓ—π– π—…π—€π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘β‘(𝒱)\textstyle{\mfld^{B}_{n}\times\Alg_{\disk^{B}_{n}}(\mathcal{V})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∫\scriptstyle{\int}𝒱\textstyle{\mathcal{V}}

where UU is the underlying space functor and the right downward arrow is the standard forgetful functor. In particular, there is a natural equivalence

∫MA≃MβŠ—A\int_{M}A~\simeq~M\otimes A

between the factorization homology of MM with coefficients in AA and the tensor of the commutative algebra AA with the underlying space of MM.

0N54

Proof. The functor βˆ’βŠ—A:ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝒱-\otimes A\colon\mfld_{n}^{B}\to\mathcal{V} carries each contractible manifold to the underlying object of the commutative algebra AA. For (Ai)i∈I(A_{i})_{i\in I} a finite sequence of commutative algebras in 𝒱\mathcal{V}, the II-fold coproduct in π– π—…π—€π–’π—ˆπ—†β‘(𝒱)\Alg_{\com}(\mathcal{V}) is the pointwise tensor product ⨂i∈I​Ai\underset{i\in I}{\bigotimes}A_{i} (see PropositionΒ 3.2.4.7 ofΒ [Lu2]). It follows that this functor βˆ’βŠ—A-\otimes A is symmetric monoidal. From the defining expression of factorization homology as a colimit, there results a natural transformation

βˆ«βˆ’AβŸΆβˆ’βŠ—A\int_{-}A\longrightarrow-\otimes A

between symmetric monoidal functors ℳ​𝖿𝗅𝖽nB→𝒱\mfld_{n}^{B}\to\mathcal{V}, which evaluates as an equivalence on objects of π’Ÿβ€‹π—‚π—Œπ—„π—‡π–‘\disk_{n}^{B}. LemmaΒ 3.18 grants that the domain of this natural transformation satisfies βŠ—\otimes-excision. Because a collar-gluing M′​⋃M0×ℝ​Mβ€²β€²β‰…MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}\times\mathbb{R}}{\bigcup}M^{\prime\prime}\cong M determines a pushout of underlying spaces Mβ€²β€‹βˆM0​M′′≃MM^{\prime}\underset{M_{0}}{\coprod}M^{\prime\prime}\simeq M, the codomain of this natural transformation too satisfies βŠ—\otimes-excision. That the natural transformation evaluates on each BB-framed nn-manifold MM as an equivalence then follows by induction on a handle decomposition on MM.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6