ScalingStacks

0N5L

Proposition 5.13. For 𝔀\mathfrak{g} a Lie algebra over kk, there is a natural equivalence of chain complexes over kk,

∫Mπ–’βˆ—π–«π—‚π–Ύβ€‹(𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(ℝn,𝔀))β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—π–«π—‚π–Ύβ€‹(𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(M,𝔀)),\int_{M}\mathsf{C}_{\ast}^{\Lie}\bigl(\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathfrak{g})\bigr)~\simeq~\mathsf{C}^{\Lie}_{\ast}\bigl(\Mapc(M,\mathfrak{g})\bigr)~,

between the factorization homology of the Lie algebra chains of Ξ©n​𝔀\Omega^{n}{\mathfrak{g}} and the Lie algebra chains of the Lie algebra 𝔀M+\mathfrak{g}^{M^{+}}.

0N5M

Proof. Lie algebra chains defines a functor between ∞\infty-categories π–’βˆ—π–«π—‚π–Ύ:𝖠𝗅𝗀𝖫𝗂𝖾⁑(π–¬π—ˆπ–½k)β†’π–¬π—ˆπ–½k\mathsf{C}^{\Lie}_{\ast}:\Alg_{\Lie}({\sf Mod}_{k})\rightarrow{\sf Mod}_{k}. This functor carries finite products of Lie algebras to finite tensor products of kk-modules, which is to say that it is symmetric monoidal. Furthermore, this functor preserves geometric realizations, so Lemma 3.25 applies to give a natural identification: ∫Mπ–’βˆ—π–«π—‚π–Ύβ€‹(𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(ℝn,𝔀))β‰ƒπ–’βˆ—π–«π—‚π–Ύβ€‹(∫M𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(ℝn,𝔀))\int_{M}\mathsf{C}_{\ast}^{\Lie}\bigl(\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathfrak{g})\bigr)\simeq\mathsf{C}_{\ast}^{\Lie}\bigl(\int_{M}\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathfrak{g})\bigr). The equivalence ∫M𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(ℝn,𝔀)≃𝖬𝖺𝗉𝖼⁑(M,𝔀)\int_{M}\Mapc(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathfrak{g})\simeq\Mapc(M,\mathfrak{g}) now follows from the argument of nonabelian PoincarΓ© duality (CorollaryΒ 4.6), only here we apply it in the usual abelian setting.66 6 See [AF2] for a complete account, where nonabelian PoincarΓ© duality is an instance of a version of PoincarΓ©/Koszul duality for Cartesian-presentable ∞\infty-categories.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6