ScalingStacks

0N5C

Proposition 5.7. Let 𝒱\mathcal{V} be a symmetric monoidal ∞\infty-category which is βŠ—\otimes-presentable and whose underlying ∞\infty-category is stable. For any Vβˆˆπ’±V\in\mathcal{V} and any nonnegative integer m<nm<n, there is an equivalence in 𝒱\mathcal{V}:

∫Sm×ℝnβˆ’mπ–₯𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇⁑(𝖡)≃π–₯𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇⁑(𝖡)βŠ—π–₯π—‹π–Ύπ–Ύπ—‡βˆ’π—†β‘(Σ𝗆​𝖡).\int_{S^{m}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-m}}\free_{n}(V)~\simeq~\free_{n}(V)\otimes\free_{n-m}(\Sigma^{m}V)~.
0N5D

Proof. We first consider the case that 𝒱=(𝖲𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗋𝖺,∧)\mathcal{V}=\bigl({\sf Spectra},\wedge\bigr) and V=Ξ£βˆžβ€‹XV=\Sigma^{\infty}X is the suspension spectrum of a pointed connected space XX. There is a natural equivalence of spaces

∫Sm×ℝnβˆ’mΞ©n​Σn​X​≃Cor​4.6​(Ξ©nβˆ’m​Σn​X)Sm≃Ωn​Σn​XΓ—Ξ©nβˆ’m​Σn​X\int_{S^{m}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-m}}\Omega^{n}\Sigma^{n}X~\underset{\rm Cor~\ref{non-abel}}{\simeq}~(\Omega^{n-m}\Sigma^{n}X)^{S^{m}}~\simeq~\Omega^{n}\Sigma^{n}X\times\Omega^{n-m}\Sigma^{n}X

where the first equivalence is by nonabelian PoincarΓ© duality and the second is by the standard trivialization of each fiber sequence π–¬π–Ίπ—‰βˆ—β‘(π–ͺ,𝖦)→𝖦π–ͺ→𝖦\Map_{*}(K,G)\rightarrow G^{K}\rightarrow G whose base is equipped with the structure of a group-like β„°1\mathcal{E}_{1}-space. (It is this second step that requires the strict inequality m<nm<n.) Passing to suspension spectra, PropositionΒ 5.5 begets the further equivalence

⋁kβ‰₯0π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώk⁑(Sm×ℝnβˆ’m)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£kβ€‹Ξ£βˆžβ€‹XβŠ—k≃(⋁iβ‰₯0π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi⁑(ℝn)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£iβ€‹Ξ£βˆžβ€‹XβŠ—i)βŠ—(⋁jβ‰₯0π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώj⁑(ℝnβˆ’m)β€‹βŠ—Ξ£jβ€‹Ξ£βˆžβ€‹(Ξ£m​X)βŠ—j).\bigvee_{k\geq 0}\conf_{k}(S^{m}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\underset{\Sigma_{k}}{\otimes}\Sigma^{\oo}X^{\otimes k}\simeq\Bigl(\bigvee_{i\geq 0}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}\Sigma^{\oo}X^{\otimes i}\Bigr)\otimes\Bigl(\bigvee_{j\geq 0}\conf_{j}(\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\underset{\Sigma_{j}}{\otimes}\Sigma^{\oo}(\Sigma^{m}X)^{\otimes j}\Bigr)~.

Collecting coefficients of terms which are homogeneous in XX determines a Ξ£k\Sigma_{k}-equivariant stable homotopy equivalence

Ξ£βˆ—βˆžπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώk(Sm×ℝnβˆ’m)β‰ƒβˆi+j=k(Ξ£kΓ—Ξ£iΞ£βˆ—βˆžπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi(ℝn))βŠ—(Ξ£kΓ—Ξ£jΞ£βˆ—βˆž(Ξ£+mjπ–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώj(ℝnβˆ’m)))\Sigma^{\infty}_{\ast}\conf_{k}(S^{m}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\simeq\coprod_{i+j=k}\Bigl(\Sigma_{k}\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\times}\Sigma^{\infty}_{\ast}\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\Bigr)\otimes\Bigr(\Sigma_{k}\underset{\Sigma_{j}}{\times}\Sigma^{\infty}_{\ast}\bigl(\Sigma^{mj}_{+}\conf_{j}(\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\bigr)\Bigl)

where Ξ£k​×Σlβˆ’\Sigma_{k}\underset{\Sigma_{l}}{\times}- is induction from Ξ£l\Sigma_{l}-spectra to Ξ£k\Sigma_{k}-spectra.

Now consider the general case for 𝒱\mathcal{V}, according to the hypothesis. After PropositionΒ 5.5, both sides of the equivalence split as coproducts in homogeneous terms VβŠ—kV^{\otimes k}, so it suffices to show that the coefficients of these terms are degreewise equivalent. Inspecting, we thus seek an equivalence in 𝒱\mathcal{V}:

π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώk(Sm×ℝnβˆ’m)βŠ—Ξ£kVβŠ—k≃⨁i+j=k(π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώi(ℝn)βŠ—Ξ£iVβŠ—i)βŠ—(π–’π—ˆπ—‡π–Ώj(ℝnβˆ’m)βŠ—Ξ£j(Ξ£mV)βŠ—j).\conf_{k}(S^{m}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\underset{\Sigma_{k}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes k}~\simeq~\bigoplus_{i+j=k}\Bigl(\conf_{i}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\underset{\Sigma_{i}}{\otimes}V^{\otimes i}\Bigr)\otimes\Bigr(\conf_{j}(\mathbb{R}^{n-m})\underset{\Sigma_{j}}{\otimes}(\Sigma^{m}V)^{\otimes j}\Bigl)~.

This equivalence follows from the conclusion of the previous paragraph upon tensoring with VβŠ—kV^{\otimes k} and taking balanced Ξ£k\Sigma_{k}-coinvariants.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Ayala, John Francis

Original source: arXiv:1206.5522v6