ScalingStacks

0NG0

Example 3.8. Let W=S2×D2W=S^{2}\times D^{2} and SS the sphere S2×{p}S^{2}\times\{p\}, where p∈∂D2p\in\partial D^{2}. Then attaching the 3-handle gives W′=B4W^{\prime}=B^{4}. Let us see what Theorem 3.7 gives in this case. For simplicity, we ignore the decomposition into relative homology classes.

The skein lasagna module of WW has the structure of a commutative algebra over ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}, with the multiplication given by putting lasagna fillings side-by-side, in the decomposition

(S2×D2)∪S2×I(S2×D2)≅S2×D2,(S^{2}\times D^{2})\cup_{S^{2}\times I}(S^{2}\times D^{2})\cong S^{2}\times D^{2},

where I⊂∂D2I\subset\partial D^{2} is an interval. As a ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-algebra, 𝒮0N​(W,∅)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;\emptyset) was computed in [25, Theorem 1.2] to be

𝒮0N​(W,∅)≅ℤ⁡[A1,…,AN−1,A0,A0−1]\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;\emptyset)\cong{\mathbb{Z}}[A_{1},\dots,A_{N-1},A_{0},A_{0}^{-1}]

where AiA_{i} comes from the lasagna filling corresponding to the closed surface S2×{0}S^{2}\times\{0\}, equipped with the standard orientation, and marked with N−1−iN-1-i dots. (As mentioned in Section 2.2, this is equivalent to introducing one input ball intersecting S2×{0}S^{2}\times\{0\} in an unknot labeled XN−1−iX^{N-1-i}.)

The cobordism maps

ΨI×Y;Δ+,ΨI×Y;Δ−:𝒮0N​(W,J)→𝒮0N​(W,∅)\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{+}},\ \Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{-}}:\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;J)\to\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;\emptyset)

are as follows. The unknot JJ is contained in a ball in the boundary of WW (say, a neighborhood of the disk Δ+\Delta_{+}). Then, according to [25, Corollary 1.5], we have

𝒮0N​(W,J)≅𝒮0N​(W)⊗ℤKhRN⁡(J)≅𝒮0N​(W)⊗ℤ(ℤ⁡[X]/(XN)).\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;J)\cong\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W)\otimes_{{\mathbb{Z}}}\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(J)\cong\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W)\otimes_{{\mathbb{Z}}}\bigl({\mathbb{Z}}[X]/(X^{N})\bigr).

(Strictly speaking, Corollary 1.5 in [25] is phrased for coefficients in a field 𝕜\mathbbm{k}, due to the fact that its proof requires choosing a basis of KhRN⁡(J)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(J). In our case, JJ is the unknot, so KhRN⁡(J)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(J) is free over ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}, and therefore the same argument applies with coefficients in ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}.)

Both maps ΨI×Y;Δ+\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{+}} and ΨI×Y;Δ−\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{-}} correspond to capping the unknot by disks. The first map acts only on the factor KhRN⁡(J)\operatorname{KhR}_{N}(J) and is given by

ΨI×Y;Δ+(v⊗XN−1−i)={vif i=0,0if ​i=1,…,N−1.\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{+}}(v\otimes X^{N-1-i})=\begin{cases}v&\text{if }i=0,\\ 0&\text{if }i=1,\dots,N-1.\end{cases}

A useful picture to have in mind is that we can represent XN−1−iX^{N-1-i} by a dotted disk (with the number of dots specified by the exponent of XX), which is completed by Δ+\Delta_{+} to a dotted sphere that bounds a ball in WW, and hence can be evaluated to a scalar as shown above. To compute the action of ΨI×Y;Δ−\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{-}}, on the other hand, note that the disk Δ−\Delta_{-} completes the dotted disk to a homologically essential dotted sphere, corresponding to a generator in 𝒮0N​(W,∅)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;\emptyset):

ΨI×Y;Δ−​(v⊗XN−1−i)=v⋅Ai.\Psi_{I\times Y;\Delta_{-}}(v\otimes X^{N-1-i})=v\cdot A_{i}.

Therefore, taking the coequalizer of the two maps as in Theorem 3.7 boils down to setting

A0=1,A1=⋯=AN−1=0A_{0}=1,\ \ A_{1}=\dots=A_{N-1}=0

in 𝒮0N​(W,∅)\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W;\emptyset). We deduce that

𝒮0N​(W′,∅)≅ℤ⁡[A1,…,AN−1,A0,A0−1]/(A1,…,An−1,A0−1)≅ℤ,\mathcal{S}_{0}^{N}(W^{\prime};\emptyset)\cong{\mathbb{Z}}[A_{1},\dots,A_{N-1},A_{0},A_{0}^{-1}]/(A_{1},\dots,A_{n-1},A_{0}-1)\cong{\mathbb{Z}},

which is the known answer for the skein lasagna module of B4B^{4}; see [27, Example 4.6].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Ciprian Manolescu, Kevin Walker, Paul Wedrich

Original source: arXiv:2206.04616v2