Example 3.8. Let and the sphere , where . Then attaching the 3-handle gives . Let us see what Theorem 3.7 gives in this case. For simplicity, we ignore the decomposition into relative homology classes.
The skein lasagna module of has the structure of a commutative algebra over , with the multiplication given by putting lasagna fillings side-by-side, in the decomposition
where is an interval. As a -algebra, was computed in [25, Theorem 1.2] to be
where comes from the lasagna filling corresponding to the closed surface , equipped with the standard orientation, and marked with dots. (As mentioned in Section 2.2, this is equivalent to introducing one input ball intersecting in an unknot labeled .)
The cobordism maps
are as follows. The unknot is contained in a ball in the boundary of (say, a neighborhood of the disk ). Then, according to [25, Corollary 1.5], we have
(Strictly speaking, Corollary 1.5 in [25] is phrased for coefficients in a field , due to the fact that its proof requires choosing a basis of . In our case, is the unknot, so is free over , and therefore the same argument applies with coefficients in .)
Both maps and correspond to capping the unknot by disks. The first map acts only on the factor and is given by
A useful picture to have in mind is that we can represent by a dotted disk (with the number of dots specified by the exponent of ), which is completed by to a dotted sphere that bounds a ball in , and hence can be evaluated to a scalar as shown above. To compute the action of , on the other hand, note that the disk completes the dotted disk to a homologically essential dotted sphere, corresponding to a generator in :
Therefore, taking the coequalizer of the two maps as in Theorem 3.7 boils down to setting
in . We deduce that
which is the known answer for the skein lasagna module of ; see [27, Example 4.6].