Lemma 3.1. Let or , then
3.1. Recollections on motivic sheaves
Let be a perfect field and All varieties are considered to be over
For a variety over we consider the triangulated category of rational motivic sheaves on 11 1 There are various definitions of that are equivalent, see [CD19, Section C.3]. We leave the choice of definition to the reader. In the literature, objects in are often referred to as relative motives or simply motives. However, we prefer the term motivic sheaf and reserve the term motive for objects in . In the special case the category agrees with Voevodsky’s triangulated category of mixed motives over
The system of categories has remarkable properties, some of which we will recall now.
First, the work of Ayoub [Ayo07a, Ayo07b] and Cisinski–Déglise [CD19] shows that can be equipped with a six-functor-formalism which works very similarly as in the setting of -adic sheaves. Important objects are the motive and motive with compact support of a variety which can be expressed in terms of the six functors as
There is an autoequivalence called Tate twist on which commutes with the six functors and can be defined by splitting the motive of the projective line as
For each prime invertible in , there is an -adic realisation functor to the category of -adic sheaves on
| (3.1) |
which is compatible with the six functors and the Tate twist, see [Ayo14].
Morphisms in are best understood in terms of higher Chow groups, as defined by Bloch [Blo86]. For smooth, there is a natural isomorphism
| (3.2) |
where denotes the tensor unit and a higher Chow group. In particular, for one obtains the usual Chow group of codimension- cycles In this case the realisation functor yields the cycle class map to -adic cohomology
For and or these hom-groups are particularly simple:
Proof. First, note that the higher -theory of finite fields is torsion for by [Qui72, Theorem 8]. The same is true for the algebraic closure, since -theory commutes with filtered colimits. Hence, for By the Riemann–Roch theorem for rational higher Chow groups, see [Blo86, Theorem 9.1], is a direct summand of The statement follows from (3.2). ∎
In the following the purity property in (3.1) will be crucial. For this reason, we will from now on restrict to the case
Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2