ScalingStacks

3.1. Recollections on motivic sheaves

Let kk be a perfect field and pt=Spec⁡(k).\operatorname{pt}=\operatorname{Spec}(k). All varieties are considered to be over k.k.

For a variety XX over kk we consider the triangulated category DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) of rational motivic sheaves on X.X.11 1 There are various definitions of DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) that are equivalent, see [CD19, Section C.3]. We leave the choice of definition to the reader. In the literature, objects in DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) are often referred to as relative motives or simply motives. However, we prefer the term motivic sheaf and reserve the term motive for objects in DM⁡(k,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q}). In the special case X=Spec⁡(k),X=\operatorname{Spec}(k), the category DM⁡(k,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q}) agrees with Voevodsky’s triangulated category of mixed motives over k.k.

The system of categories DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) has remarkable properties, some of which we will recall now.

First, the work of Ayoub [Ayo07a, Ayo07b] and Cisinski–Déglise [CD19] shows that DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) can be equipped with a six-functor-formalism which works very similarly as in the setting of ℓ\ell-adic sheaves. Important objects are the motive M⁡(X)\operatorname{M}(X) and motive with compact support Mc⁡(X)\operatorname{M}^{c}(X) of a variety f:X→ptf:X\to\operatorname{pt} which can be expressed in terms of the six functors as

M(X)=f!f!ℚ∈DM(k,ℚ) and Mc(X)=f∗f!ℚ∈DM(k,ℚ).\operatorname{M}(X)=f_{!}f^{!}\mathbb{Q}\in\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q})\text{ and }\operatorname{M}^{c}(X)=f_{*}f^{!}\mathbb{Q}\in\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q}).

There is an autoequivalence (1)=−⊗ℚ(1)(1)=-\otimes\mathbb{Q}(1) called Tate twist on DM\operatorname{DM} which commutes with the six functors and can be defined by splitting the motive of the projective line as

M⁡(ℙk1)=ℚ⊕ℚ⁡(1)​[2].\operatorname{M}(\mathbb{P}^{1}_{k})=\mathbb{Q}\oplus\mathbb{Q}(1)[2].

For each prime ℓ\ell invertible in kk, there is an ℓ\ell-adic realisation functor to the category D⁡(X,ℚℓ)\operatorname{D}(X,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell}) of ℓ\ell-adic sheaves on XX

(3.1) Realℓ:DM⁡(X,ℚ)→D⁡(X,ℚℓ),\displaystyle\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}:\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q})\to\operatorname{D}(X,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell}),

which is compatible with the six functors and the Tate twist, see [Ayo14].

Morphisms in DM⁡(X,ℚ)\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q}) are best understood in terms of higher Chow groups, as defined by Bloch [Blo86]. For XX smooth, there is a natural isomorphism

HomDM⁡(X,ℚ)⁡(ℚX,ℚX​(m)​[n])\displaystyle\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}(X,\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q}_{X},\mathbb{Q}_{X}(m)[n]) ≅HomDM⁡(k,ℚ)⁡(M⁡(X),ℚ⁡(m)​[n])\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q})}(\operatorname{M}(X),\mathbb{Q}(m)[n])
(3.2) ≅CHm⁡(X,2​m−n)ℚ,\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{CH}^{m}(X,2m-n)_{\mathbb{Q}},

where ℚX\mathbb{Q}_{X} denotes the tensor unit and CH\operatorname{CH} a higher Chow group. In particular, for n=2​mn=2m one obtains the usual Chow group of codimension-mm cycles CHm⁡(X,0)ℚ=CHm⁡(X)ℚ.\operatorname{CH}^{m}(X,0)_{\mathbb{Q}}=\operatorname{CH}^{m}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}. In this case the realisation functor Realℓ\operatorname{Real}_{\ell} yields the cycle class map to ℓ\ell-adic cohomology

CHm⁡(X)ℚ→Hét2​m​(X,ℚℓ​(m)).\operatorname{CH}^{m}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}\to H^{2m}_{\text{\'{e}t}}(X,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell}(m)).

For X=ptX=\operatorname{pt} and k=𝔽qk=\mathbb{F}_{q} or k=𝔽¯pk=\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p} these hom-groups are particularly simple:

0MXR

Lemma 3.1. Let k=𝔽qk=\mathbb{F}_{q} or k=𝔽¯pk=\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p}, then

HomDM⁡(k,ℚ)⁡(ℚ,ℚ⁡(m)​[n])={ℚ for ​n=m=0​ and0otherwise.\displaystyle\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Q}(m)[n])=\left\{\begin{array}[]{cl}\mathbb{Q}&\text{ for }n=m=0\text{ and}\\ 0&\text{otherwise.}\\ \end{array}\right.
0MXS

Proof. First, note that the higher KK-theory of finite fields Ki​(Spec⁡(𝔽q))K_{i}(\operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_{q})) is torsion for i>0i>0 by [Qui72, Theorem 8]. The same is true for the algebraic closure, since KK-theory commutes with filtered colimits. Hence, Ki​(k)ℚ=0K_{i}(k)_{\mathbb{Q}}=0 for i>0.i>0. By the Riemann–Roch theorem for rational higher Chow groups, see [Blo86, Theorem 9.1], CHm⁡(k,2​m−n)ℚ\operatorname{CH}^{m}(k,2m-n)_{\mathbb{Q}} is a direct summand of K2​m−n​(k)ℚ.K_{2m-n}(k)_{\mathbb{Q}}. The statement follows from (3.2). ∎

In the following the purity property in (3.1) will be crucial. For this reason, we will from now on restrict to the case k=𝔽¯p.k=\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2