Theorem 6.5. There is an equivalence of categories
between Springer motives with respect to for complete compositions and the perfect derived category of graded modules of the quiver Hecke algebra.
Assume that we are in the cases () or () of Section 6.2. For a fixed dimension vector we consider the collection of -equivariant maps
where ranges over all complete compositions. Denote by the quiver Hecke (KLR) algebra associated to and as defined by Khovanov–Lauda [KL09] and Rouquier [Rou08].
Theorem 6.5. There is an equivalence of categories
between Springer motives with respect to for complete compositions and the perfect derived category of graded modules of the quiver Hecke algebra.
Proof. The motivic extension algebra can be identified with To see this, one can adapt the proof of Varagnolo–Vasserot [VV11, Theorem 3.6] from the context of equivariant Borel–Moore homology to Chow groups. Their arguments apply unchanged making use of the fact that the partial quiver flag varieties admit affine pavings and hence their equivariant Borel–Moore homology and Chow groups coindice. By Proposition 6.1 conditions (PT) and (PO) hold and the statement follows by Theorem 4.9. ∎
If we let range over all compositions, the motivic extension algebra can be identified with the quiver Schur algebra defined by Stroppel–Webster [SW14] and we get:
Theorem 6.6. There is an equivalence of categories
between Springer motives with respect to for compositions and the perfect derived category of graded modules of the quiver Schur algebra.
Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2