ScalingStacks

6.4. Quiver Hecke and quiver Schur algebras

Assume that we are in the cases (AA) or (A~\widetilde{A}) of Section 6.2. For a fixed dimension vector 𝐝∈Γ\mathbf{d}\in\Gamma we consider the collection of GL⁡(𝐝)\operatorname{GL}(\mathbf{d})-equivariant maps

μ𝐝¯:𝔔⁡(𝐝¯)→Rep⁡(𝐝)\mu_{\underline{\mathbf{d}}}:\mathfrak{Q}(\underline{\mathbf{d}})\to\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbf{d})

where 𝐝¯∈Compf⁡(𝐝)\underline{\mathbf{d}}\in\operatorname{Compf}(\mathbf{d}) ranges over all complete compositions. Denote by R𝐝R_{\mathbf{d}} the quiver Hecke (KLR) algebra associated to QQ and 𝐝\mathbf{d} as defined by Khovanov–Lauda [KL09] and Rouquier [Rou08].

0MZE

Theorem 6.5. There is an equivalence of categories

DMGL⁡(𝐝)S​p​r⁡(Rep⁡(𝐝),ℚ)≅Dperfℤ⁡(R𝐝)\operatorname{DM}^{Spr}_{\operatorname{GL}(\mathbf{d})}(\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbf{d}),\mathbb{Q})\cong\operatorname{D}^{\mathbb{Z}}_{\operatorname{perf}}(R_{\mathbf{d}})

between Springer motives with respect to μ𝐝¯:𝔔⁡(𝐝¯)→Rep⁡(𝐝)\mu_{\underline{\mathbf{d}}}:\mathfrak{Q}(\underline{\mathbf{d}})\to\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbf{d}) for complete compositions 𝐝¯∈Compf⁡(𝐝)\underline{\mathbf{d}}\in\operatorname{Compf}(\mathbf{d}) and the perfect derived category of graded modules of the quiver Hecke algebra.

0MZF

Proof. The motivic extension algebra EE can be identified with R𝐝.R_{\mathbf{d}}. To see this, one can adapt the proof of Varagnolo–Vasserot [VV11, Theorem 3.6] from the context of equivariant Borel–Moore homology to Chow groups. Their arguments apply unchanged making use of the fact that the partial quiver flag varieties admit affine pavings and hence their equivariant Borel–Moore homology and Chow groups coindice. By Proposition 6.1 conditions (PT) and (PO) hold and the statement follows by Theorem 4.9. ∎

If we let 𝐝¯∈Comp⁡(𝐝)\underline{\mathbf{d}}\in\operatorname{Comp}(\mathbf{d}) range over all compositions, the motivic extension algebra EE can be identified with the quiver Schur algebra A𝐝A_{\mathbf{d}} defined by Stroppel–Webster [SW14] and we get:

0MZG

Theorem 6.6. There is an equivalence of categories

DMGL⁡(𝐝)S​p​r⁡(Rep⁡(𝐝),ℚ)≅Dperfℤ⁡(A𝐝)\operatorname{DM}^{Spr}_{\operatorname{GL}(\mathbf{d})}(\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbf{d}),\mathbb{Q})\cong\operatorname{D}^{\mathbb{Z}}_{\operatorname{perf}}(A_{\mathbf{d}})

between Springer motives with respect to μ𝐝¯:𝔔⁡(𝐝¯)→Rep⁡(𝐝)\mu_{\underline{\mathbf{d}}}:\mathfrak{Q}(\underline{\mathbf{d}})\to\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbf{d}) for compositions 𝐝¯∈Comp⁡(𝐝)\underline{\mathbf{d}}\in\operatorname{Comp}(\mathbf{d}) and the perfect derived category of graded modules of the quiver Schur algebra.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2