ScalingStacks

0MYK

Proposition 3.20. Assume that the GG-action on XX has finitely many orbits. Let ℓ≠p\ell\neq p be a prime and M,N∈DMG⁡(X).M,N\in\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X). Then the natural isomorphisms Realℓ∘(1)→Realℓ,\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}\circ(1)\to\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}, see (3.9), induces isomorphisms

⨁n∈ℤHomDMG⁡(k,ℚℓ)⁡(M,N⁡(n))→∼HomDG⁡(k,ℚℓ)⁡(Realℓ⁡(M),Realℓ⁡(N))\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(k,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})}(M,N(n))\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\to}}\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{D}_{G}(k,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})}(\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}(M),\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}(N))

if M,NM,N are ∗*- and !!-pointwise mixed Tate, respectively, and

HomDMG⁡(X,ℚℓ)⁡(M,N)→∼HomDG⁡(X,ℚℓ)⁡(Realℓ⁡(M),Realℓ⁡(N))\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})}(M,N)\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\to}}\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{D}_{G}(X,\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})}(\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}(M),\operatorname{Real}_{\ell}(N))

if M,NM,N are ∗*- and !!-pointwise pure Tate, respectively.

0MYL

Proof. As in the proof of Proposition 3.19 the statement can be reduced to the case of a point where it is the same as Proposition 3.15. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2