ScalingStacks

0MYI

Proposition 3.19. Assume that the GG-action on XX has finitely many orbits. Let M,N∈DMG⁡(X)M,N\in\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X) be ∗*- and !!-pointwise pure Tate. Then HomDMG⁡(X)⁡(M,N⁡[n])=0\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X)}(M,N[n])=0 for all n≠0.n\neq 0.

0MYJ

Proof. The statement can be shown by an induction on the number of orbits. Denote by j:G/H≅𝒪↪Xj:G/H\cong\mathcal{O}\hookrightarrow X and i:Z=X\𝒪→Xi:Z=X\backslash\mathcal{O}\to X the inclusion of an open orbit 𝒪\mathcal{O} and its closed complement Z.Z. Then the localisation triangle induces an exact sequence

HomDMG⁡(Z)(i∗M,i!N[n]){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(Z)}(i^{*}M,i^{!}N[n])}HomDMG⁡(X)⁡(M,N⁡[n]){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X)}(M,N[n])}HomDMG⁡(𝒪)(j∗M,j!N[n]).{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\mathcal{O})}(j^{*}M,j^{!}N[n]).}

Since i∗​Mi^{*}M and i!Ni^{!}N are ∗*- and !!-pointwise pure Tate, respectively, the first term of the sequence vanishes by induction. The last term vanishes since by assumption j∗​Mj^{*}M and j!Nj^{!}N correspond to objects in DTMH⁡(k,ℚ)w=0\operatorname{DTM}_{H}(k,\mathbb{Q})^{w=0} via the induction equivalence (3.6) and thus have no non-trivial extension by Proposition 3.12. See [SVW18, Corollary II.4.19] for a similar proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2