ScalingStacks

0MYJ

Proof. The statement can be shown by an induction on the number of orbits. Denote by j:G/Hβ‰…π’ͺβ†ͺXj:G/H\cong\mathcal{O}\hookrightarrow X and i:Z=X\π’ͺβ†’Xi:Z=X\backslash\mathcal{O}\to X the inclusion of an open orbit π’ͺ\mathcal{O} and its closed complement Z.Z. Then the localisation triangle induces an exact sequence

HomDMG⁑(Z)(iβˆ—M,i!N[n]){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(Z)}(i^{*}M,i^{!}N[n])}HomDMG⁑(X)⁑(M,N⁑[n]){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(X)}(M,N[n])}HomDMG⁑(π’ͺ)(jβˆ—M,j!N[n]).{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\mathcal{O})}(j^{*}M,j^{!}N[n]).}

Since iβˆ—β€‹Mi^{*}M and i!Ni^{!}N are βˆ—*- and !!-pointwise pure Tate, respectively, the first term of the sequence vanishes by induction. The last term vanishes since by assumption jβˆ—β€‹Mj^{*}M and j!Nj^{!}N correspond to objects in DTMH⁑(k,β„š)w=0\operatorname{DTM}_{H}(k,\mathbb{Q})^{w=0} via the induction equivalence (3.6) and thus have no non-trivial extension by PropositionΒ 3.12. See [SVW18, Corollary II.4.19] for a similar proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2