ScalingStacks

0MYS

Proposition 4.4. Let dj=dim๐’ฉ~j.d_{j}=\dim\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}. There is a natural isomorphism

HomDMGโก(๐’ฉ,โ„š)(ฮผi,!(โ„š๐’ฉ~i),ฮผj,!(โ„š๐’ฉ~j)(n)[2n])=CHdjโˆ’nG(Zi,j)โ„š.\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\mathcal{N},\mathbb{Q})}(\mu_{i,!}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i}}),\mu_{j,!}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}})(n)[2n])=\operatorname{CH}_{d_{j}-n}^{G}(Z_{i,j})_{\mathbb{Q}}.
0MYT

Proof. Let Z=Zi,jZ=Z_{i,j} with projections ฯ€i,j:Zโ†’๐’ฉ~i,j.\pi_{i,j}:Z\to\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i,j}. For a variety XX denote by finX:Xโ†’pt\operatorname{fin}_{X}:X\to\operatorname{pt} the structure map. Then by using various adjunctions, base change and fin๐’ฉ~jโˆ—=fin๐’ฉ~j!(โˆ’dj)[โˆ’2dj]\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}}^{*}=\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}}^{!}(-d_{j})[-2d_{j}] since ๐’ฉ~j\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j} is smooth, we get

HomDMGโก(๐’ฉ,โ„š)โก(CLOSE\displaystyle\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\mathcal{N},\mathbb{Q})}( ฮผi,!(โ„š๐’ฉ~i),ฮผj,!(โ„š๐’ฉ~j)(n)[2n])\displaystyle\mu_{i,!}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i}}),\mu_{j,!}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}})(n)[2n])
โ‰…HomDMGโก(๐’ฉ~i,โ„š)(โ„š๐’ฉ~i,ฮผi!ฮผj,โˆ—(โ„š๐’ฉ~j)(n)[2n])\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i},\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i}},\mu_{i}^{!}\mu_{j,*}(\mathbb{Q}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}})(n)[2n])
โ‰…HomDMGโก(๐’ฉ~i,โ„š)(fin๐’ฉ~iโˆ—โ„š,ฯ€i,โˆ—ฯ€j!fin๐’ฉ~jโˆ—โ„š(n)[2n])\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i},\mathbb{Q})}(\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i}}^{*}\mathbb{Q},\pi_{i,*}\pi_{j}^{!}\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}}^{*}\mathbb{Q}(n)[2n])
โ‰…HomDMGโก(k,โ„š)(โ„š,fin๐’ฉ~i,โˆ—ฯ€i,โˆ—ฯ€j!fin๐’ฉ~j!โ„š(nโˆ’dj)[2(nโˆ’dj)])\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(k,\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q},\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{i},*}\pi_{i,*}\pi_{j}^{!}\operatorname{fin}_{\widetilde{\mathcal{N}}_{j}}^{!}\mathbb{Q}(n-d_{j})[2(n-d_{j})])
โ‰…HomDMGโก(k,โ„š)(โ„š,finZ,โˆ—finZ!โ„š(nโˆ’dj)[2(nโˆ’dj)])\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(k,\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q},\operatorname{fin}_{Z,*}\operatorname{fin}_{Z}^{!}\mathbb{Q}(n-d_{j})[2(n-d_{j})])
โ‰…HomDMGโก(k,โ„š)โก(โ„š,Mcโก(Z)โ€‹(nโˆ’dj)โ€‹[2โ€‹(nโˆ’dj)]).\displaystyle\cong\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{DM}_{G}(k,\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q},\operatorname{M}^{c}(Z)(n-d_{j})[2(n-d_{j})]).

Now the last term is isomorphic to CHdjโˆ’nGโ€‹(Z)โ„š\operatorname{CH}^{G}_{d_{j}-n}(Z)_{\mathbb{Q}} by [Kel17, Theorem 5.3.14]. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2