ScalingStacks

0MYN

Proof. We first show that μ!(ℚM)\mu_{!}(\mathbb{Q}_{M}) is ∗*-pointwise pure Tate. Let ix:pt→Ni_{x}:\operatorname{pt}\to N be the inclusion of a point x∈X.x\in X. We have to show that

ix∗Forμ!(ℚM)∈DTM(k,ℚ)w=0.i_{x}^{*}\operatorname{For}\mu_{!}(\mathbb{Q}_{M})\in\operatorname{DTM}(k,\mathbb{Q})^{w=0}.

By applying base change with respect to the Cartesian diagram

μ−1​(x){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mu^{-1}(x)}M{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces M}{x}{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\{x\}}N{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces N}l\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces l}μ′\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mu^{\prime}}μ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mu}ix\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces i_{x}}

and the fact that For\operatorname{For} commutes with the six operations, we have

ix∗Forμ!(ℚM)=μ!′l∗ℚM=μ!′ℚμ−1​(x)∈DM(k,ℚ).i_{x}^{*}\operatorname{For}\mu_{!}(\mathbb{Q}_{M})=\mu^{\prime}_{!}l^{*}\mathbb{Q}_{M}=\mu^{\prime}_{!}\mathbb{Q}_{\mu^{-1}(x)}\in\operatorname{DM}(k,\mathbb{Q}).

Now μ′!ℚμ−1​(x)\mu^{\prime}_{!}\mathbb{Q}_{\mu^{-1}(x)} is pure Tate since it is Verdier dual to the motive Mc⁡(μ−1​({x})=M⁡(μ−1​({x})CLOSECLOSE\operatorname{M}^{c}(\mu^{-1}(\{x\})=\operatorname{M}(\mu^{-1}(\{x\}) and Verdier duality preserves pure Tate motives.

That μ!(ℚM)=μ∗(ℚM)\mu_{!}(\mathbb{Q}_{M})=\mu_{*}(\mathbb{Q}_{M}) is !!-pointwise pure Tate follows by using Verdier dual arguments. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Jens Niklas Eberhardt, Catharina Stroppel

Original source: arXiv:2109.00305v2