ScalingStacks

[0MLG]

Proposition 15.10. Let π’œ\mathcal{A} and ℬ\mathcal{B} be two model categories of (∞,n)(\infty,n)-categories and let L:π’œβ‡†β„¬:RL:\mathcal{A}\leftrightarrows\mathcal{B}:R be a Quillen adjunction between them. Then (L,R)(L,R) is a Quillen equivalence if and only if the left derived functor NH​L:NHβ€‹π’œβ†’NH​ℬ\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}L:\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{A}\to\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{B} preserves the cells up to weak equivalence.

[0MLH]

Proof. A Quillen equivalence induces an equivalence NH​L:NHβ€‹π’œβ†’NH​ℬ\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}L:\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{A}\to\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{B} of ∞\infty-categories. By Lemma 10.2 and Lemma 4.8 any such equivalence necessarily preserves the cells up to equivalence. Conversely, as the left-derived functor NH​L:NHβ€‹π’œβ†’NH​ℬ\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}L:\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{A}\to\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{B} preserves (homotopy) colimits and NHβ€‹π’œ\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{A} and NH​ℬ\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}\mathcal{B} are generated under (homotopy) colimits by the cells (Axiom C.2), it follows that NH​L\mathrm{N}^{\mathrm{H}}L induces an equivalence of ∞\infty-categories. In particular it induces an equivalence of homotopy categories, and hence (L,R)(L,R) is a Quillen equivalence. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

Original source Β· 1112.0040v6