We will now construct a theory of -categories – i.e., an -category that satisfies Axioms (C.1–5).
The axioms of Strong Generation, Internal Homs for correspondences, and Fundamental pushouts together suggest the following definition.
Definition 8.1. Let be the smallest set of morphisms of that
•
contains the morphisms of Notation 6.5 (i.e., the morphisms that represent the fundamental pushouts of Axiom (C.3)), and
•
is stable under the operation for .
Let be the saturated class of morphisms generated by .
Define the -category of -precategories as the localization
One might begin to feel optimistic that perhaps already satisfies our axioms;
indeed, it is easy to see that this -category satisfies Axiom (C.1) and Axiom (C.4).
As it happens, the closure of under fiber products over cells will ensure that it satisfies Axiom (C.3) as well.
Nevertheless, it does not satisfy Axiom (C.2).
We can address this problem directly:
Definition 8.2. The -category is the smallest subcategory that contains the cells (for ) and is closed under colimits.
Unfortunately, by enforcing Axiom (C.2), we have lost our trivial proof of Axiom (C.1): the inclusion
preserves all colimits, so it admits a right adjoint, but
it does not follow directly from this that our category is a localization of presheaves on .
To guarantee this, we need a further right adjoint.
To construct these adjoints, we employ our category of Definition 6.2.
Notation 8.3. We consider the -category of presheaves on the category of Definition 6.2 and the Yoneda embedding
Let denote the image of the finite set of morphisms of the same name as defined in Notation 6.5, which also represent the morphisms that appeared in (C.3).
Let be the smallest class of morphisms of that is stable under equivalence, contains , and is stable under the operation for . One may check that has countably many isomorphism classes of maps and agrees with the essential image of the class introduced in Notation 6.5. Let be the strongly saturated class of morphisms of generated by the class .
Let us study the localization .
The inclusion induces a functor , which admits a left adjoint (given by left Kan extension) and a right adjoint (given by right Kan extension).
Since and each preserve those presheaves represented by objects of as well as all colimits, it follows that
Consequently,
And so admits a left adjoint (where is the localization ) and a right adjoint .
Proof.Since the cells are contained in , it follows that .
Suppose that ; then the unit induces an equivalence
for any cell .
Now consider the smallest subcategory of consisting of objects such that the unit map induces an equivalence for all . As we have seen this subcategory contains the cells. It is also closed under colimits since if we write , where all the are in this subcategory, then
It follows that this subcategory is all of , and thus induces an equivalence .
∎
Before we continue to show that the restriction of to is essentially surjective, we will first show that satisfies Axiom (C.3). We will formulate this as a proposition.
Proposition 8.5.Let be a small category, and let be a functor.
Let be a strongly saturated class of morphisms in of small generation.
Denote by the precomposition with the functor .
Consider along with the restriction of to the representable objects;
then the pair satisfies Axiom (C.3) if and only if enjoys the following condition.
(C.3-bis)
There is a subset that generates as a strongly saturated class for which the following condition holds.
For any object of , any functor of , any morphism of , and any morphism of , the induced morphism
Proof.For any -local object of , a morphism represents an object of if and only if, for any morphism of , the square
is homotopy cartesian, since the horizontal map at the bottom is an equivalence. For this, it suffices to show that the induced map on homotopy fibers over any vertex of is an equivalence. Unpacking this, we obtain the condition that for any morphism , the map
is a weak equivalence. We therefore deduce that may be exhibited as a localization , where is the strongly saturated class generated by the set of diagrams of the form
in which .
Now suppose a morphism of . Since colimits are universal in [28, § 6.1.1], the functor
given by pullback along preserves all colimits, and the universal property of localizations guarantees that the composite
descends to a colimit-preserving functor
(which then must also be given by the pullback along ) if and only if, for any diagram
in which and , the induced morphism lies in .
It is clear that it suffices to check this only for nondegenerate morphisms .
It now remains only to show that it suffices to check this for objects among the essential image of .
This follows from the fact that the class is strongly saturated and the fact that generates under colimits.
∎
The collection , , , and , satisfies Axiom (C.3-bis) by construction, whence we may deduce that the pair consisting of the -category and the Yoneda embedding therefore satisfies Axiom (C.3).
Moreover the collection , , , and , also satisfies Axiom (C.3-bis) by construction, whence also satisfies Axiom (C.3), where is the composite of the Yoneda embedding and .
Proof.The 0-truncated objects of are precisely those presheaves of spaces taking values in the 0-truncated spaces, i.e., functors . The 0-truncated objects of consist of precisely those 0-truncated objects of which are -local. By Lemma 6.6, the nerve of every gaunt -category is -local, and so the result follows.
∎
The restriction of to is the composition of with the Yoneda embedding . This fully faithful functor will provide the “Basic Data” for our axiomatization.
Proof.Lemma 8.4 shows that the restriction of to is fully faithful.
Now to prove that is essentially surjective when restricted to , it suffices to prove that is generated under colimits by the cells.
Since every object is a colimit of representables, it suffices to prove that itself is generated under colimits in by the cells.
To prove this, we filter in the following manner.
Let be the globular category of cells. For any ,
define to be the full subcategory of spanned by the set
That is, consists of colimits, formed in , of diagrams of objects of .
We claim that the collection forms an exhaustive filtration of , so that we have .
First we observe that the strongly saturated class contains the map
and thus, by induction, the union contains .
It now suffices to show that this union is closed under fiber products over cells.
Since colimits commute with fiber products over cells (both in and ) it is sufficient to show that is contained in the union for all .
The fiber products of cells were analyzed in detail in Remark 6.3 and the proof of Lemma 6.7, where it was shown that they can all be obtained from the cells by a finite number of the colimits provided by .
These are colimits in , whence the result follows.
∎
Corollary 8.8.The right adjoint to the inclusion is identified with under the equivalence above.
In particular, it admits both a left adjoint and a right adjoint .
Proof.Let be an object, and consider the map .
The claim is that is an equivalence.
Since the cells generate under colimits, it’s enough to observe that is an equivalence, for any cell .
∎
By definition, is generated under colimits by the cells;
in other words, satisfies Axiom (C.2).
By Prop. 8.5 and Prop. 8.7, satisfies Axiom (C.3).
Also by construction, the pair satisfies Axiom (C.4).
Finally, we now aim to prove that the pair satisfies the final versality axiom.
Here is the key point.
Proposition 8.10.Let be a pair consisting of a presentable -category and a fully faithful functor for which Axioms (C.1), (C.3), and (C.4) hold.
Then there is a left adjoint and a natural transformation that the restriction is an equivalence.
Proof.By Axiom (C.1), the left Kan extension of along the Yoneda embedding is a localization ;
the right adjoint is a fully faithful functor .
Write for the class of morphisms of that are carried to equivalences of by , so that .
The class is strongly saturated, and by [28, Proposition 5.5.4.16], it is of small generation.
By Axiom (C.4), the class contains the morphisms of Notation 6.5.
We claim further that .
To prove this, it suffices to show that is stable under the operation for any .
So let be the subset consisting of those morphisms of such that for any morphism and any morphism of , the pullback also lies in .
By the universality of colimits in , it follows that is closed under colimits.
From Proposition 8.5 for , , and , we deduce that since satisfies Axiom (C.3), there is a subset that generates under colimits and is stable under the operation for any .
Hence , and so .
Since (and thus ), it follows that factors through a left adjoint , which by a small abuse we will also call .
Composing this left adjoint with the fully faithful left adjoint , we obtain our desired left adjoint .
To construct the desired natural transformation , compose the counit with to obtain , and then restrict along Yoneda to obtain .
By definition, is an equivalence when restricted to , and thus a fortiori when restricted to .
∎