ScalingStacks

8. A colossal model of (∞,n)(\infty,n)-categories[0MLW]

We will now construct a theory of (∞,n)(\infty,n)-categories – i.e., an ∞\infty-category that satisfies Axioms (C.1–5). The axioms of Strong Generation, Internal Homs for correspondences, and Fundamental pushouts together suggest the following definition.

[0MJ0]

Definition 8.1. Let T0T_{0} be the smallest set of morphisms of 𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}) that

  • •

    contains the morphisms of Notation 6.5 (i.e., the morphisms that represent the fundamental pushouts of Axiom (C.3)), and

  • •

    T0T_{0} is stable under the operation H×Ci(−)H\times_{C_{i}}(-) for H∈GauntnωH\in\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}.

Let TT be the saturated class of morphisms generated by T0T_{0}.

Define the ∞\infty-category of (∞,n)(\infty,n)-precategories as the localization

PreCat(∞,n):=T−1​𝒫⁡(Gauntnω).\precat_{(\infty,n)}\mathrel{\mathop{:}}=T^{-1}\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}).

One might begin to feel optimistic that perhaps PreCat(∞,n)\precat_{(\infty,n)} already satisfies our axioms; indeed, it is easy to see that this ∞\infty-category satisfies Axiom (C.1) and Axiom (C.4). As it happens, the closure of T0T_{0} under fiber products over cells will ensure that it satisfies Axiom (C.3) as well. Nevertheless, it does not satisfy Axiom (C.2). We can address this problem directly:

[0MJ1]

Definition 8.2. The ∞\infty-category Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is the smallest subcategory that contains the cells CiC_{i} (for 0≤i≤n0\leq i\leq n) and is closed under colimits.

Unfortunately, by enforcing Axiom (C.2), we have lost our trivial proof of Axiom (C.1): the inclusion

Cat(∞,n)↪PreCat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)}\hookrightarrow\precat_{(\infty,n)}

preserves all colimits, so it admits a right adjoint, but it does not follow directly from this that our category is a localization of presheaves on Gauntnω\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}. To guarantee this, we need a further right adjoint.

To construct these adjoints, we employ our category Υn\Upsilon_{n} of Definition 6.2.

[0MJ2]

Notation 8.3. We consider the ∞\infty-category 𝒫⁡(Υn)\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) of presheaves on the category Υn\Upsilon_{n} of Definition 6.2 and the Yoneda embedding

f:Υn↪τ≤0​𝒫⁡(Υn)↪𝒫⁡(Υn).f\colon\Upsilon_{n}\hookrightarrow\tau_{\leq 0}\pre(\Upsilon_{n})\hookrightarrow\pre(\Upsilon_{n}).

Let S00S_{00} denote the image of the finite set of morphisms of the same name as defined in Notation 6.5, which also represent the morphisms that appeared in (C.3). Let S0S_{0} be the smallest class of morphisms of 𝒫⁡(Υn)\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) that is stable under equivalence, contains S00S_{00}, and is stable under the operation X×Ci(−)X\times_{C_{i}}(-) for X∈ΥnX\in\Upsilon_{n}. One may check that S0S_{0} has countably many isomorphism classes of maps and agrees with the essential image of the class S0S_{0} introduced in Notation 6.5. Let SS be the strongly saturated class of morphisms of 𝒫⁡(Υn)\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) generated by the class S0S_{0}. Let us study the localization S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}).

The inclusion j:Υn↪Gauntnj\colon\Upsilon_{n}\hookrightarrow\gaunt_{n} induces a functor j∗:𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)→𝒫⁡(Υn)j^{\ast}\colon\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega})\to\pre(\Upsilon_{n}), which admits a left adjoint j!j_{!} (given by left Kan extension) and a right adjoint j∗j_{\ast} (given by right Kan extension). Since j!j_{!} and j∗j^{\ast} each preserve those presheaves represented by objects of Υn\Upsilon_{n} as well as all colimits, it follows that

j!(S)⊆Tandj∗(T)⊆S.j_{!}(S)\subseteq T\quad\text{and}\quad j^{\ast}(T)\subseteq S.

Consequently,

j∗​(PreCat(∞,n))⊆S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)andj∗​(S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn))⊆PreCat(∞,n).j^{\ast}(\precat_{(\infty,n)})\subseteq S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n})\quad\text{and}\quad j_{\ast}(S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}))\subseteq\precat_{(\infty,n)}.

And so j∗:PreCat(∞,n)→S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)j^{\ast}\colon\precat_{(\infty,n)}\to S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) admits a left adjoint LTj!L_{T}j_{!} (where LTL_{T} is the localization 𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)→T−1​𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)=PreCat(∞,n)\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega})\to T^{-1}\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega})=\precat_{(\infty,n)}) and a right adjoint j∗j_{\ast}.

[0MJ3]

Lemma 8.4. The restriction of the functor j∗j^{\ast} to Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is fully-faithful.

[0MJ4]

Proof. Since the cells are contained in Υn\Upsilon_{n}, it follows that j!j∗Ci≃Cij_{!}j^{*}C_{i}\simeq C_{i}. Suppose that Y∈PreCat(∞,n)Y\in\precat_{(\infty,n)}; then the unit Y→j∗​j∗​YY\to j_{\ast}j^{\ast}Y induces an equivalence

Map(Ci,Y)≃Map(j!j∗Ci,Y)≃Map(Ci,j∗j∗Y)\map(C_{i},Y)\simeq\map(j_{!}j^{*}C_{i},Y)\simeq\map(C_{i},j_{\ast}j^{\ast}Y)

for any cell CiC_{i}.

Now consider the smallest subcategory of Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} consisting of objects XX such that the unit map induces an equivalence Map⁡(X,Y)≃Map⁡(X,j∗​j∗​Y)\map(X,Y)\simeq\map(X,j_{\ast}j^{\ast}Y) for all Y∈PreCat(∞,n)Y\in\precat_{(\infty,n)}. As we have seen this subcategory contains the cells. It is also closed under colimits since if we write X≃colimαXαX\simeq\colim_{\alpha}X_{\alpha}, where all the XαX_{\alpha} are in this subcategory, then

Map⁡(X,Y)≃limαMap⁡(Xα,Y)≃limαMap⁡(Xα,j∗​j∗​Y)≃Map⁡(X,j∗​j∗​Y).\map(X,Y)\simeq\lim_{\alpha}\map(X_{\alpha},Y)\simeq\lim_{\alpha}\map(X_{\alpha},j_{\ast}j^{\ast}Y)\simeq\map(X,j_{\ast}j^{\ast}Y).

It follows that this subcategory is all of Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)}, and thus j∗j^{\ast} induces an equivalence Map⁡(X,Y)≃Map⁡(j∗​X,j∗​Y)\map(X,Y)\simeq\map(j^{\ast}X,j^{\ast}Y). ∎

Before we continue to show that the restriction of j∗j^{*} to Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is essentially surjective, we will first show that S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) satisfies Axiom (C.3). We will formulate this as a proposition.

[0MJ5]

Proposition 8.5. Let ℛ\mathcal{R} be a small category, and let i:ℛ→Gauntnωi\colon\mathcal{R}\to\gaunt_{n}^{\omega} be a functor. Let KK be a strongly saturated class of morphisms in 𝒫⁡(ℛ)\pre(\mathcal{R}) of small generation. Denote by i∗:𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)→𝒫⁡(ℛ)i^{*}\colon\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega})\to\pre(\mathcal{R}) the precomposition with the functor ii. Consider 𝒞:=U−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ)\mathcal{C}\mathrel{\mathop{:}}=U^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}) along with the restriction ff of i∗i^{\ast} to the representable objects; then the pair (𝒞,f)(\mathcal{C},f) satisfies Axiom (C.3) if and only if KK enjoys the following condition.

  1.   (C.3-bis)

    There is a subset K0⊂KK_{0}\subset K that generates KK as a strongly saturated class for which the following condition holds. For any object WW of ℛ\mathcal{R}, any functor i⁡(W)→Cki(W)\to C_{k} of Gauntn\gaunt_{n}, any morphism U→VU\to V of K0K_{0}, and any morphism V→CkV\to C_{k} of 𝒫⁡(ℛ)\pre(\mathcal{R}), the induced morphism

    U×Cki⁡(W)→V×Cki⁡(W)U\times_{C_{k}}i(W)\to V\times_{C_{k}}i(W)

    lies in KK.

[0MJ6]

Proof. For any KK-local object XX of 𝒫⁡(ℛ)\pre(\mathcal{R}), a morphism Y→XY\to X represents an object of (K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ))/X(K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}))_{/X} if and only if, for any morphism U→VU\to V of K0K_{0}, the square

Map⁡(V,Y)\map(V,Y)Map⁡(V,X)\map(V,X)Map⁡(U,Y)\map(U,Y)Map⁡(U,X)\map(U,X).

is homotopy cartesian, since the horizontal map at the bottom is an equivalence. For this, it suffices to show that the induced map on homotopy fibers over any vertex of Map⁡(V,X)\map(V,X) is an equivalence. Unpacking this, we obtain the condition that for any morphism V→XV\to X, the map

Map/X⁡(V,Y)→Map/X⁡(U,Y)\map_{/X}(V,Y)\to\map_{/X}(U,Y)

is a weak equivalence. We therefore deduce that (K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ))/X(K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}))_{/X} may be exhibited as a localization KX−1​(𝒫⁡(ℛ)/X)K_{X}^{-1}(\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/X}), where KXK_{X} is the strongly saturated class generated by the set of diagrams of the form

UUXXVVϕ\phi

in which ϕ∈K0\phi\in K_{0}.

Now suppose η:Z→Ck\eta\colon Z\to C_{k} a morphism of K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ)K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}). Since colimits are universal in 𝒫⁡(ℛ)\pre(\mathcal{R}) [28, § 6.1.1], the functor

𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Ck→𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Z\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/C_{k}}\to\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/Z}

given by pullback along η\eta preserves all colimits, and the universal property of localizations guarantees that the composite

𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Ck→𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Z→KZ−1​(𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Z)≃(K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ))/Z\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/C_{k}}\to\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/Z}\to K_{Z}^{-1}(\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/Z})\simeq(K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}))_{/Z}

descends to a colimit-preserving functor

(K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ))/Ck≃KCk−1​(𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Ck)→KZ−1​(𝒫⁡(ℛ)/Z)≃(K−1​𝒫⁡(ℛ))/Z(K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}))_{/C_{k}}\simeq K_{C_{k}}^{-1}(\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/C_{k}})\to K_{Z}^{-1}(\pre(\mathcal{R})_{/Z})\simeq(K^{-1}\pre(\mathcal{R}))_{/Z}

(which then must also be given by the pullback along η\eta) if and only if, for any diagram

UUCkC_{k}VVϕ\phi

in which 0≤k≤n0\leq k\leq n and ϕ∈K0\phi\in K_{0}, the induced morphism U×CkZ→V×CkZU\times_{C_{k}}Z\to V\times_{C_{k}}Z lies in KK.

It is clear that it suffices to check this only for nondegenerate morphisms V→CkV\to C_{k}. It now remains only to show that it suffices to check this for objects ZZ among the essential image of ℛ\mathcal{R}. This follows from the fact that the class KK is strongly saturated and the fact that ℛ\mathcal{R} generates 𝒫⁡(ℛ)\pre(\mathcal{R}) under colimits. ∎

The collection ℛ=Gauntnω\mathcal{R}=\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}, i=idi=\id, K=TK=T, and K0=T0K_{0}=T_{0}, satisfies Axiom (C.3-bis) by construction, whence we may deduce that the pair consisting of the ∞\infty-category PreCat(∞,n)\precat_{(\infty,n)} and the Yoneda embedding Gauntnω↪PreCat(∞,n)\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}\hookrightarrow\precat_{(\infty,n)} therefore satisfies Axiom (C.3).

Moreover the collection ℛ=Υn\mathcal{R}=\Upsilon_{n}, i=ji=j, K=SK=S, and K0=S0K_{0}=S_{0}, also satisfies Axiom (C.3-bis) by construction, whence (S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn),g)(S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}),g) also satisfies Axiom (C.3), where gg is the composite of the Yoneda embedding and j∗j^{*}.

[0MJ7]

Lemma 8.6. The Yoneda embedding Υn→𝒫⁡(Υn)\Upsilon_{n}\to\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) factors through a fully-faithful inclusion

Υn↪τ≤0​𝒫⁡(Υn).\Upsilon_{n}\hookrightarrow\tau_{\leq 0}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}).

This induces a fully-faithful nerve functor

g:Gauntn↪τ≤0​S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn).g:\gaunt_{n}\hookrightarrow\tau_{\leq 0}S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}).
[0MJ8]

Proof. The 0-truncated objects of 𝒫⁡(Υn)\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) are precisely those presheaves of spaces taking values in the 0-truncated spaces, i.e., functors Υnop→Set\Upsilon_{n}^{\mathrm{op}}\to\set. The 0-truncated objects of Cat(∞,n)=S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)\cat_{(\infty,n)}=S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) consist of precisely those 0-truncated objects of 𝒫⁡(Υn)\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) which are SS-local. By Lemma 6.6, the nerve of every gaunt nn-category is SS-local, and so the result follows. ∎

The restriction of gg to Gauntnω\gaunt_{n}^{\omega} is the composition of j∗j^{\ast} with the Yoneda embedding Gauntnω↪𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}\hookrightarrow\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}). This fully faithful functor will provide the “Basic Data” for our axiomatization.

[0MJ9]

Proposition 8.7. The functor j∗j^{\ast} restricts to an equivalence Cat(∞,n)≃S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)\cat_{(\infty,n)}\simeq S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}).

[0MJA]

Proof. Lemma 8.4 shows that the restriction of j∗j^{\ast} to Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is fully faithful. Now to prove that j∗j^{\ast} is essentially surjective when restricted to Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)}, it suffices to prove that S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) is generated under colimits by the cells. Since every object is a colimit of representables, it suffices to prove that Υn\Upsilon_{n} itself is generated under colimits in S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) by the cells. To prove this, we filter Υn\Upsilon_{n} in the following manner.

Let Υn(0)=𝔾n\Upsilon_{n}^{(0)}=\mathbb{G}_{n} be the globular category of cells. For any k≥1k\geq 1, define Υn(k)\Upsilon_{n}^{(k)} to be the full subcategory of Υn\Upsilon_{n} spanned by the set

{X∈Υn|there exists a colimit diagram ​f:K⊳→S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)such that ​f​(+∞)≃X​ and ​f​(K)⊂Υn(k−1)}.\left\{X\in\Upsilon_{n}\;\middle|\;\begin{aligned} &\textrm{there exists a colimit diagram }f\colon K^{\rhd}\to S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n})\\ &\textrm{such that }f(+\infty)\simeq X\textrm{ and }f(K)\subset\Upsilon_{n}^{(k-1)}\end{aligned}\right\}.

That is, Υn(k)⊂Υn\Upsilon_{n}^{(k)}\subset\Upsilon_{n} consists of colimits, formed in S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}), of diagrams of objects of Υn(k−1)\Upsilon_{n}^{(k-1)}.

We claim that the collection {Υn(k)}\{\Upsilon_{n}^{(k)}\} forms an exhaustive filtration of Υn\Upsilon_{n}, so that we have ∪kΥn(k)=Υn\cup_{k}\Upsilon_{n}^{(k)}=\Upsilon_{n}. First we observe that the strongly saturated class SS contains the map

σ(i(o1))∪C0σ(i(o2))∪C0⋯∪C0σ(i(om))→i([m];o1,…,om)\sigma(i(o_{1}))\cup^{C_{0}}\sigma(i(o_{2}))\cup^{C_{0}}\cdots\cup^{C_{0}}\sigma(i(o_{m}))\to i([m];o_{1},\dots,o_{m})

and thus, by induction, the union ∪kΥn(k)\cup_{k}\Upsilon_{n}^{(k)} contains Θn\Theta_{n}.

It now suffices to show that this union is closed under fiber products over cells. Since colimits commute with fiber products over cells (both in Gauntn\gaunt_{n} and S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n})) it is sufficient to show that Cj×CiCkC_{j}\times_{C_{i}}C_{k} is contained in the union for all i,j,k≤ni,j,k\leq n. The fiber products of cells were analyzed in detail in Remark 6.3 and the proof of Lemma 6.7, where it was shown that they can all be obtained from the cells by a finite number of the colimits provided by S00S_{00}. These are colimits in Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)}, whence the result follows. ∎

[0MJB]

Corollary 8.8. The right adjoint R:PreCat(∞,n)→Cat(∞,n)R\colon\precat_{(\infty,n)}\to\cat_{(\infty,n)} to the inclusion is identified with j∗j^{\ast} under the equivalence above. In particular, it admits both a left adjoint LTj!L_{T}j_{!} and a right adjoint j∗j_{\ast}.

[0MJC]

Proof. Let X∈PreCat(∞,n)X\in\precat_{(\infty,n)} be an object, and consider the map R​X→XRX\to X. The claim is that j∗​R​X→j∗​Xj^{*}RX\to j^{*}X is an equivalence. Since the cells generate S−1​𝒫⁡(Υn)S^{-1}\pre(\Upsilon_{n}) under colimits, it’s enough to observe that Map⁡(Ci,R​X)≃(R​X)​(Ci)→X⁡(Ci)≃M​a​p​(Ci,X)\map(C_{i},RX)\simeq(RX)(C_{i})\to X(C_{i})\simeq Map(C_{i},X) is an equivalence, for any cell CiC_{i}. ∎

[0MJD]

Corollary 8.9. The ∞\infty-category Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is a localization of 𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}), and so (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) satisfies Axiom (C.1).

By definition, Cat(∞,n)\cat_{(\infty,n)} is generated under colimits by the cells; in other words, (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) satisfies Axiom (C.2). By Prop. 8.5 and Prop. 8.7, (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) satisfies Axiom (C.3). Also by construction, the pair (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) satisfies Axiom (C.4). Finally, we now aim to prove that the pair (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) satisfies the final versality axiom. Here is the key point.

[0MJE]

Proposition 8.10. Let (𝒞,f)(\mathcal{C},f) be a pair consisting of a presentable ∞\infty-category 𝒞\mathcal{C} and a fully faithful functor f:Gauntnω↪𝒞f\colon\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{C} for which Axioms (C.1), (C.3), and (C.4) hold. Then there is a left adjoint K:Cat(∞,n)→𝒞K\colon\cat_{(\infty,n)}\to\mathcal{C} and a natural transformation η:K​g→f\eta\colon Kg\to f that the restriction η|𝔾n\eta|\mathbb{G}_{n} is an equivalence.

[0MJF]

Proof. By Axiom (C.1), the left Kan extension of ff along the Yoneda embedding is a localization F:𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)→𝒞F\colon\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega})\to\mathcal{C}; the right adjoint is a fully faithful functor G:𝒞↪𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)G\colon\mathcal{C}\hookrightarrow\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}). Write WW for the class of morphisms of 𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}) that are carried to equivalences of 𝒞\mathcal{C} by FF, so that 𝒞≃W−1​𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\mathcal{C}\simeq W^{-1}\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}). The class WW is strongly saturated, and by [28, Proposition 5.5.4.16], it is of small generation.

By Axiom (C.4), the class WW contains the morphisms of Notation 6.5. We claim further that T0⊆WT_{0}\subseteq W. To prove this, it suffices to show that WW is stable under the operation H×Ci(−)H\times_{C_{i}}(-) for any H∈GauntnωH\in\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}.

So let W′⊆WW^{\prime}\subseteq W be the subset consisting of those morphisms ϕ:X→Y\phi\colon X\to Y of WW such that for any morphism Y→CiY\to C_{i} and any morphism H→CiH\to C_{i} of Gauntnω\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}, the pullback H×Ciϕ:H×CiX→H×CiYH\times_{C_{i}}\phi\colon H\times_{C_{i}}X\to H\times_{C_{i}}Y also lies in WW. By the universality of colimits in 𝒫⁡(Gauntnω)\pre(\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}), it follows that W′W^{\prime} is closed under colimits. From Proposition 8.5 for ℛ=Gauntnω\mathcal{R}=\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}, i=idi=\id, and U=WU=W, we deduce that since (𝒞,f)(\mathcal{C},f) satisfies Axiom (C.3), there is a subset W0⊆WW_{0}\subseteq W that generates WW under colimits and is stable under the operation H×Ci(−)H\times_{C_{i}}(-) for any H∈GauntnωH\in\gaunt_{n}^{\omega}. Hence W0⊆W′W_{0}\subseteq W^{\prime}, and so W′=WW^{\prime}=W.

Since T0⊆WT_{0}\subseteq W (and thus T⊆WT\subseteq W), it follows that FF factors through a left adjoint PreCat(∞,n)→𝒞\precat_{(\infty,n)}\to\mathcal{C}, which by a small abuse we will also call FF. Composing this left adjoint with the fully faithful left adjoint j!:Cat(∞,n)↪PreCat(∞,n)j_{!}\colon\cat_{(\infty,n)}\hookrightarrow\precat_{(\infty,n)}, we obtain our desired left adjoint K:=Fj!K\mathrel{\mathop{:}}=Fj_{!}.

To construct the desired natural transformation η\eta, compose the counit j!j∗→idj_{!}j^{*}\to\id with FF to obtain K​j∗→FKj^{*}\to F, and then restrict along Yoneda to obtain η:K​g→f\eta\colon Kg\to f. By definition, η\eta is an equivalence when restricted to Υn\Upsilon_{n}, and thus a fortiori when restricted to 𝔾n\mathbb{G}_{n}. ∎

[0MJG]

Corollary 8.11. The pair (Cat(∞,n),g)(\cat_{(\infty,n)},g) is a theory of (∞,n)(\infty,n)-categories, and so Thy(∞,n)\thy_{(\infty,n)} is nonempty.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

Original source · 1112.0040v6