ScalingStacks

0MV1

Proof: We first show that Hom⁢(S,−) is faithful. Again, consider distinguished triangle (5.1):

Σ−1⁢A→S→B→A.

By Lemma 5.3, any object M∈𝒞 is isomorphic to some coproduct B(I), where I is an indexing set and B(I) denotes the, possibly infinite, coproduct ∐i∈IB. Hence, to show fidelity we can consider a morphism B(I)→B(J) which becomes zero under Hom⁢(S,−) and show that it is itself necessarily zero. It is sufficient to show that the composite B↪B(I)→B(J) is zero, where the morphism B↪B(I) is just the coproduct inclusion into the ith-summand for each i∈I. This puts us in the following situation:

Σ−1⁢AS0BA∃B(I)B(J).

But, A∈Σ−1⁢𝒜 and B(J)∈𝒞=𝒜∩ℬ, so that Hom⁢(A,B(J))=0. Therefore, the dotted arrow above is necessarily zero. Hence the composite B↪B(I)→B(J) is zero, showing that Hom⁢(S,−) is faithful.

We must also show that Hom⁢(S,−) is full. Suppose we have a morphism

θ:Hom⁢(S,B(I))→Hom⁢(S,B(J)),

where I and J are again indexing sets. We must construct a morphism B(I)→B(J) which induces θ under Hom⁢(S,−). We recall distinguished triangle (5.1) again:

Σ−1⁢A⟶S⟶σB⟶A.

Note that σ:S→B becomes an isomorphism under Hom⁢(−,B(I)) because B(I)∈𝒞. Hence we get the following commutative diagram:

(5.4) Hom⁢(S,B(I))θHom⁢(S,B(J))Hom⁢(B,B(I))ϕHom⁢(σ,B(I))∼Hom⁢(B,B(J))Hom⁢(σ,B(J))∼

where ϕ=Hom⁢(σ,B(J))−1∘θ∘Hom⁢(σ,B(I)). Let qi:B↪B(I) be the ith-inclusion of the coproduct and consider its image ϕ⁢(qi):B→B(J). By the universal property of the coproduct there exists a unique map ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩:B(I)→B(J) such that the following diagram commutes for each i∈I:

Bqiϕ⁢(qi)B(I)⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩B(J).

Let us show that ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩ induces θ under Hom⁢(S,−). The map Hom⁢(S,σ):Hom⁢(S,S)→Hom⁢(S,B) is an isomorphism, therefore, it takes a set of generators for Hom⁢(S,S) to a set of generators for Hom⁢(S,B). The vector space Hom⁢(S,S) is one-dimensional and generated by the identity map on S, 1S, whose image under Hom⁢(S,σ) is σ:S→B. Hence Hom⁢(S,B) is generated by σ. By the compactness of S, we have

Hom⁢(S,B(I))≅∐IHom⁢(S,B)

and B(I) is generated by |I| copies of σ. It follows that Hom⁢(S,B(I)) is generated by the family {σ∘qi}i∈I. Therefore, we now only need to check that θ and the map, Hom⁢(S,⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩), induced by ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩ coincide on this set of generators.

By the commutativity of diagram (5.4) we have:

θ⁢(qi∘σ) = Hom⁢(σ,B(J))∘ϕ⁢(qi)
= ϕ⁢(qi)∘σ
= (⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩∘qi)∘σ
= ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩∘(qi∘σ)
= Hom⁢(S,⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩)⁢(qi∘σ)

Hence, θ and Hom⁢(S,⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩) coincide on a basis of Hom⁢(S,B(I)), thus

θ=Hom⁢(S,⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩)

with ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩∈Hom⁢(B(I),B(J)). Therefore, the functor Hom⁢(S,−) is full and faithful. □

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Pauksztello

Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2