2.3. A -structure obtained from a rigid object
Example 2.1 can be abstracted to an arbitrary triangulated category by looking at objects behaving like chain DGAs. Let be a chain DGA, and recall from the introduction that, given a DG -module we have
|
|
|
Thus, being a chain DGA means that for .
Now let be an arbitrary triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. In the introduction, an object of was called rigid if we had
|
|
|
Hence, a DGA is a chain DGA if an only if it is a rigid object in its derived category . If we replace the chain DGA with some suitably nice rigid object of , the following is a candidate for a -structure on :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The suitably nice conditions we must place on to obtain this -structure are that must be a compact object of and the set must be a generating set for . Before stating the theorem in full, we recall the notions of a compact object and a generating set.
An object in a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts is compact if the functor commutes with set indexed coproducts, that is the canonical map is an isomorphism
|
|
|
for all families of objects of indexed by a set ; see [15] and [16]. A DGA is trivially a compact object of .
A set of objects in a triangulated category is called a generating set for if given any object of with for all objects of , we have .
Example 2.1 is a special case of the following theorem of Hoshino, Kato and Miyachi, which appears in [11].
0MUA
Theorem 2.3 ([11], Theorem 1.3).
Let be a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. Suppose is a compact rigid object of and assume that is a generating set for . Then the following forms a non-degenerate -structure on :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, its heart is an admissible abelian subcategory of in the sense of [3], and the functor
|
|
|
is an equivalence of categories.
The -structure is induced as follows: suppose is an object of , a morphism with is constructed such that, given any other object and a morphism , then this morphism factors uniquely through ,