ScalingStacks

2. Some examples of t-structures and co-t-structures

2.1. A canonical example

The following example is taken from [7]. Let π’ž be an additive category and let 𝒦⁒(π’ž) be its homotopy category. We claim that the following pair of full subcategories of 𝒦⁒(π’ž) forms a co-t-structure on 𝒯=𝒦⁒(π’ž). Let

π’œ = {complexes in 𝒦⁒(π’ž)Β isomorphic to complexes ⁒C|Ci=0⁒ for ⁒i<0},
ℬ = {complexes in 𝒦⁒(π’ž)Β isomorphic to complexes ⁒C|Ci=0⁒ for ⁒i>0}.

It is clear that π’œ and ℬ are closed under direct summands, and that Ξ£βˆ’1β’π’œβŠ†π’œ and β„¬βŠ†Ξ£βˆ’1⁒ℬ. It is also clear that Hom⁒(Ξ£βˆ’1β’π’œ,ℬ)=0. We need to show that property (3) of Definition 1.4 holds. Suppose X is an object of 𝒦⁒(π’ž):

X:β‹―Xβˆ’2Xβˆ’1X0X1X2β‹―.

We obtain the following semi-split short exact sequence of complexes:

Ξ£βˆ’1⁒A:β‹―000X1X2β‹―X:β‹―Xβˆ’2Xβˆ’1X0X1X2β‹―B:β‹―Xβˆ’2Xβˆ’1X000β‹―

which gives us a distinguished triangle

Ξ£βˆ’1⁒Aβ†’Xβ†’Bβ†’A

in 𝒦⁒(π’ž). Hence (π’œ,ℬ) is a co-t-structure on 𝒯=𝒦⁒(π’ž). Moreover, it is non-degenerate and its coheart is just the class of complexes sitting in degree zero.

2.2. Chain and cochain DGAs

Recall from the introduction that a DGA R is called a chain DGA if Hi⁒(R)=0 for all i>0; similarly, a DGA R is called a cochain DGA if Hi⁒(R)=0 for all i<0. A cochain DGA R is called simply connected if, in addition, H0⁒(R) is a division ring and H1⁒(R)=0.

0MU8

Example 2.1. Let R be a chain DGA. Let π’Ÿβ’(R) be the derived category of DG R-modules, see [6], and define a pair of subcategories of π’Ÿβ’(R) as follows:

𝒳 = {Mβˆˆπ’Ÿβ’(R)|Hi⁒(M)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0},
𝒴 = {Mβˆˆπ’Ÿβ’(R)|Hi⁒(M)=0⁒ for ⁒i<0}.

It is easy to show that the pair (𝒳,𝒴) forms a t-structure on π’Ÿβ’(R). Again, this t-structure is non-degenerate and its heart consists of DG R-modules whose cohomology is concentrated in degree zero.

0MU9

Example 2.2. Let R be a simply connected cochain DGA. Let π’Ÿβ’(R) be the derived category of DG R-modules and define a pair of subcategories of π’Ÿβ’(R) as follows:

π’œ = {Mβˆˆπ’Ÿβ’(R)|Hi⁒(M)=0⁒ for ⁒i<0},
ℬ = {Mβˆˆπ’Ÿβ’(R)|Hi⁒(M)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0}.

It is easy to show that the pair (π’œ,ℬ) forms a co-t-structure on π’Ÿβ’(R). As in Example 2.1, this co-t-structure is non-degenerate and its coheart consists of DG R-modules whose cohomology sits in degree zero.

Simply connected cochain DGAs arise naturally in algebraic topology as the cochain algebras of simply connected CW-complexes, see [9] and [17], for example.

2.3. A t-structure obtained from a rigid object

Example 2.1 can be abstracted to an arbitrary triangulated category by looking at objects behaving like chain DGAs. Let R be a chain DGA, and recall from the introduction that, given a DG R-module M we have

Hi⁒(M)=Homπ’Ÿβ’(R)⁒(R,Ξ£i⁒M)⁒ for ⁒iβˆˆβ„€.

Thus, R being a chain DGA means that Homπ’Ÿβ’(R)⁒(R,Ξ£i⁒R)=0 for i>0.

Now let 𝒯 be an arbitrary triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. In the introduction, an object S of 𝒯 was called rigid if we had

Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒S)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0.

Hence, a DGA R is a chain DGA if an only if it is a rigid object in its derived category π’Ÿβ’(R). If we replace the chain DGA R with some suitably nice rigid object S of 𝒯, the following is a candidate for a t-structure on 𝒯:

𝒳 = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0},
𝒴 = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i<0}.

The suitably nice conditions we must place on S to obtain this t-structure are that S must be a compact object of 𝒯 and the set {Ξ£i⁒S|iβˆˆβ„€} must be a generating set for 𝒯. Before stating the theorem in full, we recall the notions of a compact object and a generating set.

An object S in a triangulated category 𝒯 with set indexed coproducts is compact if the functor Hom⁒(S,βˆ’) commutes with set indexed coproducts, that is the canonical map is an isomorphism

Hom⁒(S,∐i∈IXi)β‰…βˆi∈IHom⁒(S,Xi)

for all families of objects {Xi}i∈I of 𝒯 indexed by a set I; see [15] and [16]. A DGA R is trivially a compact object of π’Ÿβ’(R).

A set of objects 𝒒 in a triangulated category 𝒯 is called a generating set for 𝒯 if given any object X of 𝒯 with Hom⁒(G,X)=0 for all objects G of 𝒒, we have X=0.

Example 2.1 is a special case of the following theorem of Hoshino, Kato and Miyachi, which appears in [11].

0MUA

Theorem 2.3 ([11], Theorem 1.3). Let 𝒯 be a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. Suppose S is a compact rigid object of 𝒯 and assume that {Ξ£i⁒S|iβˆˆβ„€} is a generating set for 𝒯. Then the following forms a non-degenerate t-structure on 𝒯:

𝒳 = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0},
𝒴 = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i<0}.

Moreover, its heart β„‹=π’³βˆ©π’΄ is an admissible abelian subcategory of 𝒯 in the sense of [3], and the functor

Hom⁒(S,βˆ’):β„‹β†’Mod⁒(End⁒(S)op)

is an equivalence of categories.

The t-structure is induced as follows: suppose X is an object of 𝒯, a morphism Ξ±:Xβ†’Y with Yβˆˆπ’΄ is constructed such that, given any other object Yβ€²βˆˆπ’΄ and a morphism Xβ†’Yβ€², then this morphism factors uniquely through Ξ±:Xβ†’Y,

XΞ±Yβˆƒ!Yβ€².

2.4. A co-t-structure obtained from a corigid object

In this paper we shall look at the structure which is induced by an object behaving like a cochain DGA. The subsequent sections of this paper are devoted to proving the following theorem, which is the cochain analogue, or dual, of Theorem 2.3.

0MUB

Theorem 2.4. Let 𝒯 be a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. Suppose S is a compact simply connected corigid object of 𝒯 and assume that {Ξ£i⁒S|iβˆˆβ„€} is a generating set for 𝒯. Then the following forms a non-degenerate co-t-structure on 𝒯:

π’œ = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i<0},
ℬ = {Xβˆˆπ’―|Hom𝒯⁒(S,Ξ£i⁒X)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0}.

Moreover, its coheart π’ž=π’œβˆ©β„¬ is an abelian subcategory of 𝒯, and the functor

Hom⁒(S,βˆ’):π’žβ†’Mod⁒(End⁒(S)op)

is an equivalence of categories.

Theorem 2.4 is the natural generalisation of Example 2.2 in the same way that Theorem 2.3 is the natural generalisation of Example 2.1.

In Section 3 we shall show that given any object M of 𝒯, there exists a morphism ΞΌ:Mβ†’MΒ― with M¯∈SβŸ‚βˆž such that, given any other object N∈SβŸ‚βˆž and a morphism Mβ†’N, then this morphism factors through ΞΌ:Mβ†’MΒ―,

MΞ±MΒ―βˆƒN.

However, the factorisation is not necessarily unique. Thus we obtain an SβŸ‚βˆž-preenvelope. Note that in Theorem 2.4 above, ℬ=SβŸ‚βˆž. In Section 4 we show that this SβŸ‚βˆž-preenvelope induces a non-degenerate co-t-structure on 𝒯, while Section 5 is dedicated to proving that the coheart of this non-degenerate co-t-structure is equivalent to the module category Mod⁒(End⁒(S)op), and hence abelian.

We now make precise what we mean by an object of a triangulated category behaving like a cochain DGA. Following the definition of an n-rigid object in a triangulated category of Iyama and Yoshino in [12], we make the following definitions of an n-corigid object and a corigid object.

0MUC

Definition 2.5. An object S of 𝒯 will be called n-corigid if we have

Hom⁒(Σi⁒S,S)=0⁒ for ⁒0<i<n.

An object S of 𝒯 will be called corigid if we have

Hom⁒(Σi⁒S,S)=0⁒ for ⁒i>0.

Note that a DGA R is a cochain DGA if and only if it is a corigid object in its derived category π’Ÿβ’(R).

0MUD

Definition 2.6. Let S be an object of 𝒯. We shall call S a simply connected corigid object of 𝒯 if it satisfies the following assumptions:

(1) S is corigid, that is, Hom⁒(Σi⁒S,S)=0 for i>0;

(2) Hom⁒(S,Σ⁒S)=0;

(3) End⁒(S) is a division ring.

Note that a DGA R is a simply connected cochain DGA if and only if it is a simply connected corigid object in its derived category π’Ÿβ’(R).

0MUE

Remark 2.7. For technical reasons, in the cochain analogue of Theorem 2.3 we must also insist that S is simply connected in the sense of Definition 2.6. This is due to the lack of symmetry in the theory of chain and cochain DGAs mentioned in the introduction: one is able to construct a theory for chain DGAs, but in order to construct a viable dual theory for cochain DGAs one has to introduce the assumption of simply connectedness; see, for example, [2].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Pauksztello

Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2