2. Some examples of -structures and co--structures
2.1. A canonical example
The following example is taken from [7]. Let be an additive category and let be its homotopy category. We claim that the following pair of full subcategories of forms a co--structure on . Let
It is clear that and are closed under direct summands, and that and . It is also clear that . We need to show that property of Definition 1.4 holds. Suppose is an object of :
We obtain the following semi-split short exact sequence of complexes:
which gives us a distinguished triangle
in . Hence is a co--structure on . Moreover, it is non-degenerate and its coheart is just the class of complexes sitting in degree zero.
2.2. Chain and cochain DGAs
Recall from the introduction that a DGA is called a chain DGA if for all ; similarly, a DGA is called a cochain DGA if for all . A cochain DGA is called simply connected if, in addition, is a division ring and .
Example 2.1.Let be a chain DGA. Let be the derived category of DG -modules, see [6], and define a pair of subcategories of as follows:
It is easy to show that the pair forms a -structure on . Again, this -structure is non-degenerate and its heart consists of DG -modules whose cohomology is concentrated in degree zero.
Example 2.2.Let be a simply connected cochain DGA. Let be the derived category of DG -modules and define a pair of subcategories of as follows:
It is easy to show that the pair forms a co--structure on . As in Example 2.1, this co--structure is non-degenerate and its coheart consists of DG -modules whose cohomology sits in degree zero.
Simply connected cochain DGAs arise naturally in algebraic topology as the cochain algebras of simply connected CW-complexes, see [9] and [17], for example.
2.3. A -structure obtained from a rigid object
Example 2.1 can be abstracted to an arbitrary triangulated category by looking at objects behaving like chain DGAs. Let be a chain DGA, and recall from the introduction that, given a DG -module we have
Thus, being a chain DGA means that for .
Now let be an arbitrary triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. In the introduction, an object of was called rigid if we had
Hence, a DGA is a chain DGA if an only if it is a rigid object in its derived category . If we replace the chain DGA with some suitably nice rigid object of , the following is a candidate for a -structure on :
The suitably nice conditions we must place on to obtain this -structure are that must be a compact object of and the set must be a generating set for . Before stating the theorem in full, we recall the notions of a compact object and a generating set.
An object in a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts is compact if the functor commutes with set indexed coproducts, that is the canonical map is an isomorphism
for all families of objects of indexed by a set ; see [15] and [16]. A DGA is trivially a compact object of .
A set of objects in a triangulated category is called a generating set for if given any object of with for all objects of , we have .
Example 2.1 is a special case of the following theorem of Hoshino, Kato and Miyachi, which appears in [11].
Theorem 2.3([11], Theorem 1.3).Let be a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. Suppose is a compact rigid object of and assume that is a generating set for . Then the following forms a non-degenerate -structure on :
Moreover, its heart is an admissible abelian subcategory of in the sense of [3], and the functor
is an equivalence of categories.
The -structure is induced as follows: suppose is an object of , a morphism with is constructed such that, given any other object and a morphism , then this morphism factors uniquely through ,
2.4. A co--structure obtained from a corigid object
In this paper we shall look at the structure which is induced by an object behaving like a cochain DGA. The subsequent sections of this paper are devoted to proving the following theorem, which is the cochain analogue, or dual, of Theorem 2.3.
Theorem 2.4.Let be a triangulated category with set indexed coproducts. Suppose is a compact simply connected corigid object of and assume that is a generating set for . Then the following forms a non-degenerate co--structure on :
Moreover, its coheart is an abelian subcategory of , and the functor
is an equivalence of categories.
Theorem 2.4 is the natural generalisation of Example 2.2 in the same way that Theorem 2.3 is the natural generalisation of Example 2.1.
In Section 3 we shall show that given any object of , there exists a morphism with such that, given any other object and a morphism , then this morphism factors through ,
However, the factorisation is not necessarily unique. Thus we obtain an -preenvelope. Note that in Theorem 2.4 above, . In Section 4 we show that this -preenvelope induces a non-degenerate co--structure on , while Section 5 is dedicated to proving that the coheart of this non-degenerate co--structure is equivalent to the module category , and hence abelian.
We now make precise what we mean by an object of a triangulated category behaving like a cochain DGA. Following the definition of an -rigid object in a triangulated category of Iyama and Yoshino in [12], we make the following definitions of an -corigid object and a corigid object.
Remark 2.7.For technical reasons, in the cochain analogue of Theorem 2.3 we must also insist that is simply connected in the sense of Definition 2.6. This is due to the lack of symmetry in the theory of chain and cochain DGAs mentioned in the introduction: one is able to construct a theory for chain DGAs, but in order to construct a viable dual theory for cochain DGAs one has to introduce the assumption of simply connectedness; see, for example, [2].