ScalingStacks

We must also show that Hom⁢(S,−) is full. Suppose we have a morphism

θ:Hom⁢(S,B(I))→Hom⁢(S,B(J)),

where I and J are again indexing sets. We must construct a morphism B(I)→B(J) which induces θ under Hom⁢(S,−). We recall distinguished triangle (5.1) again:

Σ−1⁢A⟶S⟶σB⟶A.

Note that σ:S→B becomes an isomorphism under Hom⁢(−,B(I)) because B(I)∈𝒞. Hence we get the following commutative diagram:

(5.4) Hom⁢(S,B(I))θHom⁢(S,B(J))Hom⁢(B,B(I))ϕHom⁢(σ,B(I))∼Hom⁢(B,B(J))Hom⁢(σ,B(J))∼

where ϕ=Hom⁢(σ,B(J))−1∘θ∘Hom⁢(σ,B(I)). Let qi:B↪B(I) be the ith-inclusion of the coproduct and consider its image ϕ⁢(qi):B→B(J). By the universal property of the coproduct there exists a unique map ⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩:B(I)→B(J) such that the following diagram commutes for each i∈I:

Bqiϕ⁢(qi)B(I)⟨ϕ⁢(qi)⟩B(J).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

David Pauksztello

Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2