ScalingStacks

[0ML0]

Proof. If n=0n=0, there is nothing to prove. If nn is positive, then let us suppose that we have written CSSn−1\CSS_{n-1} as a localization TΔ×n−1−1​𝒫⁡(Δ×n−1)T_{\Delta^{\!\times n-1}}^{-1}\pre(\Delta^{\!\times n-1}) for some strongly saturated class TΔ×n−1T_{\Delta^{\!\times n-1}} of small generation. Denote by

⊠:𝒫⁡(Δ)×𝒫⁡(Δ×n−1)→𝒫⁡(Δ×n)\boxtimes\colon\pre(\Delta)\times\pre(\Delta^{\!\times n-1})\to\pre(\Delta^{\!\times n})

the essentially unique functor that carries pairs of the form (j⁡[k],j⁡(𝐦))(j[k],j(\mathbf{m})) to j⁡([k],𝐦)j([k],\mathbf{m}) and preserves colimits separately in each variable. Now let TΔ×nT_{\Delta^{\!\times n}} be the strongly saturated class generated by the class TT above along with the set

{j[k]⊠U→j[k]⊠V|[U→V]∈TΔ×n−1}.\{j[k]\boxtimes U\to j[k]\boxtimes V\ |\ [U\to V]\in T_{\Delta^{\!\times n-1}}\}.

Now CSS⁡(Δ×n)\CSS(\Delta^{\!\times n}) coincides with TΔ×n−1​𝒫⁡(Δ×n)T_{\Delta^{\!\times n}}^{-1}\pre(\Delta^{\!\times n}). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

    Original source · 1112.0040v6