Proof. As commutes with colimits, to show that it is sufficient to show this property for a subset that generates under colimits. The maps in are clearly mapped into . This leaves the maps . We now write and induct on . When , one has .
Assume that . The suspension functor preserves colimits and sends the generators into . Hence the suspensions of maps in are in . Moreover, by construction the image under of the following map
|
|
|
is in for all cells . By induction, it follows that all the Segal generators are mapped into
except possibly the following
| (13.14.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where . To show that maps the above morphism to a morphism in , we observe that the above map may be rewritten as follows. The source may be written as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while the target is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schematically then, the map of (13.14.1) is of the form
|
|
|
for in and . By property (C.2) of (cf. also Proposition 8.5) it follows that (13.14.1) lies in also.
∎