ScalingStacks

[0MKQ]

Proof. By Lemma 13.9, it is enough to show that the strongly saturated classes TΘn(b)T_{\Theta_{n}}^{(b)} contains the generating sets SegalΘn\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}} and CompΘn\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}}. By Lemma 13.10, it suffices to show that for any [U→V]∈SegalΘn∪CompΘn[U\to V]\in\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}}\cup\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}}, any nondegenerate morphism [H→Ci]∈Jb[H\to C_{i}]\in J_{b}, and any nondegenerate morphism V→CiV\to C_{i} of 𝒫⁡(Θn)\pre(\Theta_{n}), we must show that

U′=U×Ciν​H→V×Ciν​H=V′U^{\prime}=U\times_{C_{i}}\nu H\to V\times_{C_{i}}\nu H=V^{\prime}

is contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}. Observe the following:

  • •

    If [U→V]∈SegalΘn[U\to V]\in\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}} is not in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}, then U→VU\to V is contained in TΘn(b)T_{\Theta_{n}}^{(b)} by Lemma 13.11.

  • •

    If [U→V]∈CompΘn[U\to V]\in\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}} is not in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}, then V=C0V=C_{0}, and the only nondegenerate map V→CiV\to C_{i} occurs when i=0i=0. In this case U→VU\to V is in TΘn(b)T_{\Theta_{n}}^{(b)} by [34, Proposition 6.1].

Thus we may restrict our attention to those generators U→VU\to V that lie in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}. We proceed by induction. When n=1n=1, the set of generators in the image of σ!\sigma_{!} is empty.

Assume that

TΘn−1=TΘn−1(a)=TΘn−1(b)=TΘn−1(c),T_{\Theta_{n-1}}=T_{\Theta_{n-1}}^{(a)}=T_{\Theta_{n-1}}^{(b)}=T_{\Theta_{n-1}}^{(c)},

and let U→VU\to V be an element of SegalΘn∪CompΘn\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}}\cup\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}} that lies in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}. Now note that if Ci=C0C_{i}=C_{0}, then U′→V′U^{\prime}\to V^{\prime} lies in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}, again by [34, Proposition 6.1]. If i≠0i\neq 0, then by Lemma 13.4, the map V→CiV\to C_{i} is also in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}. In this case, if we have a factorization H→C0→CiH\to C_{0}\to C_{i} (which, since H→CiH\to C_{i} is nondegenerate, can only happen if H=C0H=C_{0}), then U′→V′U^{\prime}\to V^{\prime} is an equivalence (as both are empty). Hence it U→VU\to V lies in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}.

This leaves the final case, where both [U→V][U\to V] and [V→Ci][V\to C_{i}] lie in the image of σ!\sigma_{!}, and [H→Ci][H\to C_{i}] is nondegenerate with H=j⁡([m],o1,…,om)≠C0H=j({[m]};o_{1},\dots,o_{m})\neq C_{0}, for some m≥1m\geq 1, oi∈Θn−1o_{i}\in\Theta_{n-1}. The nondegenerate map H→Ci=([1];Ci−1)H\to C_{i}=({[1]};C_{i-1}) is given explicitly by the following data (see also the proof of Lemma 13.3): a map ik:[m]→[1]i_{k}:{[m]}\to{[1]} for some 1≤k≤m1\leq k\leq m such that ik​(i)=0i_{k}(i)=0 if i<ki<k and ik​(i)=1i_{k}(i)=1 otherwise, together with a single (nondegenerate) map ok→Ci−1o_{k}\to C_{i-1}. In this case we may explicitly compute the pullback

U′=U×CiH→V×CiH=V′U^{\prime}=U\times_{C_{i}}H\to V\times_{C_{i}}H=V^{\prime}

and deduce that it is contained in the class TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}.

As [U→V][U\to V] is in the image of σ![1]\sigma_{!}^{[1]}, it is of the form ([1];U′′)→([1];V′′)({[1]};U^{\prime\prime})\to({[1]};V^{\prime\prime}) for some [U′′→V′′][U^{\prime\prime}\to V^{\prime\prime}] in SegalΘn−1\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n-1}}. The pullback is then given explicitly as:

U′=([m]CLOSE;\displaystyle U^{\prime}=({[m]}; OPENo1,…,ok×Ci−1U′′,ok+1,…,om)\displaystyle o_{1},\dots,o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}U^{\prime\prime},o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})
→([m],o1,…,ok×Ci−1V′′,ok+1,…,om)=V′.\displaystyle\to({[m]};o_{1},\dots,o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}V^{\prime\prime},o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})=V^{\prime}.

This map arises as the right-most vertical map in the following (oddly drawn) commuting square:

j([k−1];o1,…,ok−1)∪j⁡({k−1})({k−1,k};ok×Ci−1U′′)∪j⁡({k})j({k,…,m};ok+1,…,om)j({[k-1]};o_{1},\dots,o_{k-1})\cup^{j({\{k-1\}})}({\{k-1,k\}};o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}U^{\prime\prime})\cup^{j({\{k\}})}j({\{k,\dots,m\}};o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})j([k−1];o1,…,ok−1)∪j⁡({k−1})({k−1,k};ok×Ci−1V′′)∪j⁡({k})j({k,…,m};ok+1,…,om)j({[k-1]};o_{1},\dots,o_{k-1})\cup^{j({\{k-1\}})}({\{k-1,k\}};o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}V^{\prime\prime})\cup^{j({\{k\}})}j({\{k,\dots,m\}};o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})([m],o1,…,ok×Ci−1U′′,ok+1,…,om)({[m]};o_{1},\dots,o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}U^{\prime\prime},o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})([m],o1,o2,…,ok×Ci−1V′′,ok+1,…,om)({[m]};o_{1},o_{2},\dots,o_{k}\times_{C_{i-1}}V^{\prime\prime},o_{k+1},\dots,o_{m})

The left-most vertical map is a pushout of identities and (by induction) a map in σ!(TΘn−1)\sigma_{!}(T_{\Theta_{n-1}}). Thus by Lemma 13.3 it is contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}. Both horizontal maps are contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}} by [34, Proposition 6.4], whence the right-most vertical map [U′→V′][U^{\prime}\to V^{\prime}] is also contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}, as desired. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

    Original source · 1112.0040v6