ScalingStacks

[0MKF]

Proof. By Lemma 13.7, it is enough to check that the generators of SegalΘn\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}} and CompΘn\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}} of TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}} are contained in TΘn(c)T_{\Theta_{n}}^{(c)}. For that assume that [U→V][U\to V] is a generator of TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}} and let Cj↪CiC_{j}\hookrightarrow C_{i} be an inclusion. We wish to demonstrate that for all V→CiV\to C_{i} we have that

(13.8.1) U×CiCj→V×CiCjU\times_{C_{i}}C_{j}\to V\times_{C_{i}}C_{j}

is in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}. Recall that

CompΘn=ι!CompΔ∪σ!CompΘn−1 and SegalΘn=SegalΘn∪σ!SegalΘn−1.\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}}=\iota_{!}\mathrm{Comp}_{\Delta}\cup\sigma_{!}\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n-1}}\textrm{\quad and\quad}\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}}=\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n}}\cup\sigma_{!}\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n-1}}.

There are several cases:

  1. (a)

    i=ji=j. In this trivial case (13.8.1) reduces to [U→V]∈TΘn[U\to V]\in T_{\Theta_{n}}.

  2. (b)

    The morphism V→CiV\to C_{i} factors as V→C0→CiV\to C_{0}\to C_{i}. In this case the fiber product Cj×CiC0C_{j}\times_{C_{i}}C_{0} is either C0C_{0} or empty. In the latter case (13.8.1) is an isomorphism, and in the former case it is [U→V]∈TΘn[U\to V]\in T_{\Theta_{n}}. Notice that this case covers ι!CompΔ\iota_{!}\mathrm{Comp}_{\Delta}.

  3. (c)

    j=0<ij=0<i and the map V→CiV\to C_{i} does not factor through C0C_{0}. In this case it follows that [U→V][U\to V] is not in ι!CompΔ\iota_{!}\mathrm{Comp}_{\Delta}, and hence

    V=([m],o1,…,om)V=([m];o_{1},...,o_{m})

    is representable with m≠0m\neq 0. Moreover the map

    V→Ci=([1];Ci−1)V\to C_{i}=([1];C_{i-1})

    consists of a surjective map [m]→[1][m]\to[1] (which specifies a unique 0<k≤m0<k\leq m; the inverse image of 0∈[1]0\in[1] consists of all elements strictly less than kk) together with map ok→Ci−1o_{k}\to C_{i-1}. A direct calculation shows that in this situation (13.8.1) is either an isomorphism or a generator of TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}.

  4. (d)

    0<j≤i0<j\leq i, the map

    [U→V]∈σ!CompΘn−1∪σ!SegalΘn−1[U\to V]\in\sigma_{!}\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n-1}}\cup\sigma_{!}\mathrm{Segal}_{\Theta_{n-1}}

    is a suspension, and the map V→CiV\to C_{i} does not factor through C0C_{0}. It follows that V→CiV\to C_{i} is the suspension of a map. This case then follows by induction and Lemma 13.3.

  5. (e)

    The final case is when 0<j<i0<j<i, the map [U→V]∈SeΘn[U\to V]\in Se_{\Theta_{n}} is not a suspension, nor in CompΘn\mathrm{Comp}_{\Theta_{n}}, and the map V→CiV\to C_{i} does not factor through C0C_{0}. In this case (13.8.1) is a map of the form described in Lemma 13.5. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

    Original source · 1112.0040v6