ScalingStacks

[0MK5]

Proof. The set S00S_{00} consists of the union of four subsets of maps, corresponding to the four families of fundamental pushouts of types (a), (b), (c), and (d) in Axiom (C.3). The second and last subsets corresponding to the (b) and (d) families pullback to morphisms which are contained in the generating set of TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}. Thus it remains to prove the that the same holds for the remaining families (a) and (c). In particular, we wish to show that for each 0≤i≤n0\leq i\leq n, each 0≤j,k≤n−i0\leq j,k\leq n-i, and every nondegenerate morphism Ci+j→CiC_{i+j}\to C_{i} and Ci+k→CiC_{i+k}\to C_{i}, the natural morphism

(13.2.1) f(Ci+j∪CiCi+k))∪f⁡(σi+1​(Cj−1×Ck−1))(f(Ci+k∪Ci\displaystyle f(C_{i+j}\cup^{C_{i}}C_{i+k}))\cup^{f(\sigma^{i+1}(C_{j-1}\times C_{k-1}))}(f(C_{i+k}\cup^{C_{i}} OPENCi+j)\displaystyle C_{i+j})
→f⁡(Ci+j×CiCi+k),\displaystyle\to f(C_{i+j}\times_{C_{i}}C_{i+k}),

is contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}} where the pushout is formed as in Notation 6.5.

In fact a stronger statement holds (cf. [34, Proposition 4.9]). For each object o∈Θno\in\Theta_{n} we have a natural bijection of sets

hom(o,Ci+j×CiCi+k)≅hom(o,Ci+j∪CiCi+k))∪hom⁡(o,Ci+m)hom(o,Ci+k∪CiCi+j).\hom(o,C_{i+j}\times_{C_{i}}C_{i+k})\cong\hom(o,C_{i+j}\cup^{C_{i}}C_{i+k}))\cup^{\hom(o,C_{i+m})}\hom(o,C_{i+k}\cup^{C_{i}}C_{i+j}).

Thus Eq. 13.2.1 is in fact an equivalence in the presheaf category 𝒫⁡(Θn)\pre(\Theta_{n}). In particular the family (c) pulls back to a family of equivalences, which are hence contained in TΘnT_{\Theta_{n}}. An virtually identical argument applies the family (a), which also consists of morphisms pulling back to equivalences of presheaves. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Clark Barwick, Christopher Schommer-Pries

Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6

    Original source · 1112.0040v6