Lemma 11.4. Condition (R.1) is implied by the conjunction of the following.
- (R.1-bis(a))
.
- (R.1-bis(b))
For any morphism of , and for any morphisms and with , the pullback
lies in .
Lemma 11.4. Condition (R.1) is implied by the conjunction of the following.
.
For any morphism of , and for any morphisms and with , the pullback
lies in .
Proof. First, consider the subclass containing those morphisms of such that for any nondegenerate morphisms and , the pullback
lies in . Since colimits in are universal, one deduces immediately that the class is strongly saturated. Hence (R.1-bis(b)) implies that . Thus is closed under pullbacks along morphisms and contains (by (R.1-bis(a))), hence contains all of . ∎
Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6
Original source · 1112.0040v6