Theorem 11.2. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied.
- (R.1)
.
- (R.2)
.
- (R.3)
Any counit is in for any .
- (R.4)
For each , there exists an object such that .
Then is an equivalence, and is a theory of -categories.
Theorem 11.2. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied.
.
.
Any counit is in for any .
For each , there exists an object such that .
Then is an equivalence, and is a theory of -categories.
Proof. Condition (R.1) implies both that carries -local objects to -local objects and that we obtain an adjunction:
Similarly, condition (R.2) implies that carries -local objects to -local objects and that we obtain a second adjunction:
Since sends -local objects to -local objects, when restricted to the -local objects of . Thus restricts to a functor
that admits a left adjoint and a right adjoint .
Notice that in , where we have identified and with their images under the Yoneda embedding in, respectively, and . Thus by (R.3) the counit map applied to ,
becomes an equivalence in (the last equality follows from Lemma 8.6, as the image of consists of -local objects). The endofunctor is a composite of left adjoints, hence commutes with colimits. Therefore, as is dense in , the functor is determined by its restriction to . It is equivalent the left Kan extension of its restriction to . Consequently is equivalent to the identity functor.
On the other hand, for each , consider the other counit map . For each , we have natural equivalences,
which follow from (R.3), (R.4), the identity , and the fact that is -local. By Remark 7.1 this implies that the counit is an equivalence. Thus is a functor with both a left and right inverse, hence is itself an equivalence of -categories. ∎
Original source: arXiv:1112.0040v6
Original source · 1112.0040v6