ScalingStacks

[0KEU]

Proof (of 2.13). For dโ‰ค0d\leq 0 this follows directly from the definitions, and so we assume that dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1. Let KK be a simplicial set. On the one hand,

homโก(K,homhdโ€‹๐’žRโก(X,Y))\displaystyle\hom\left(K,\hom_{h_{d}\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\right) =\displaystyle= hom(X,Y)โก(Jโก(K),hdโ€‹๐’ž)\displaystyle\hom_{\left(X,Y\right)}\left(J\left(K\right),h_{d}\mathcal{C}\right)
=\displaystyle= [Jโ€‹(K)dโˆ’1,Jโ€‹(K)d,Jโ€‹(K)d+1;๐’ž](X,Y),\displaystyle\left[J\left(K\right)^{d-1},J\left(K\right)^{d},J\left(K\right)^{d+1};\mathcal{C}\right]_{\left(X,Y\right)},

where subscript (X,Y)\left(X,Y\right) indicates that we take only the subset of maps that restrict to (X,Y)\left(X,Y\right) on โˆ‚ฮ”1โ†ชJโก(K)\partial\Delta^{1}\hookrightarrow J\left(K\right) (observe that this is independent of the representative as โˆ‚ฮ”1โІJโ€‹(K)dโˆ’1\partial\Delta^{1}\subseteq J\left(K\right)^{d-1}). On the other hand,

homโก(K,hdโˆ’1โ€‹hom๐’žRโก(X,Y))\displaystyle\hom\left(K,h_{d-1}\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\right) =\displaystyle= [Kdโˆ’2,Kdโˆ’1,Kd;hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)].\displaystyle\left[K^{d-2},K^{d-1},K^{d};\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\right].

We will argue that this last set is in natural bijection with the set

[Jโก(Kdโˆ’2),Jโก(Kdโˆ’1),Jโก(Kd),๐’ž](X,Y).\left[J\left(K^{d-2}\right),J\left(K^{d-1}\right),J\left(K^{d}\right),\mathcal{C}\right]_{\left(X,Y\right)}.

First, by definition of the right mapping space we have a natural bijection between maps of the form f:Kdโˆ’1โ†’hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)f\colon K^{d-1}\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right) and maps of the form fยฏ:Jโก(Kdโˆ’1)โ†’๐’ž\overline{f}\colon J\left(K^{d-1}\right)\to\mathcal{C} restricting to (X,Y)\left(X,Y\right) on โˆ‚ฮ”1โІJโก(Kdโˆ’1)\partial\Delta^{1}\subseteq J\left(K^{d-1}\right). Second, ff extends to KdK^{d} if and only if fยฏ\overline{f} extends to Jโก(Kd)J\left(K^{d}\right). Likewise, it is clear that two maps f,g:Kdโˆ’1โ†’hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)f,g\colon K^{d-1}\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right) agree on Kdโˆ’2K^{d-2} if and only if the corresponding maps fยฏ,gยฏ:Jโก(Kdโˆ’1)โ†’๐’ž\overline{f},\overline{g}\colon J\left(K^{d-1}\right)\to\mathcal{C} agree on Jโก(Kdโˆ’2)J\left(K^{d-2}\right). Hence, the only thing we need to show is that ff and gg are homotopic rel. Kdโˆ’2K^{d-2} if and only if fยฏ\overline{f} and gยฏ\overline{g} are homotopic rel. Jโก(Kdโˆ’2)J\left(K^{d-2}\right) and this follows from (1)โ‡”(3)\left(1\right)\iff\left(3\right) in 2.17. It remains to observe that for every simplicial set KK and every dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1 we have a canonical isomorphism Jโก(Kdโˆ’1)โ€‹โŸถโˆผโ€‹Jโ€‹(K)d.J\left(K^{d-1}\right)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}J\left(K\right)^{d}. Hence, we get a natural bijection

homโก(K,homhdโ€‹๐’žRโก(X,Y))โ‰ƒhomโก(K,hdโˆ’1โ€‹hom๐’žRโก(X,Y))\hom\left(K,\hom_{h_{d}\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\right)\simeq\hom\left(K,h_{d-1}\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\right)

and therefore an isomorphism ฮฑ:homhdโ€‹๐’žRโก(X,Y)โ‰ƒhdโˆ’1โ€‹hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)\alpha\colon\hom_{h_{d}\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\simeq h_{d-1}\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right).

Finally, we need to show that the isomorphism we have constructed is compatible with the maps ฮธ:hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)โ†’hdโˆ’1โ€‹hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)\theta\colon\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\to h_{d-1}\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right) and ฮฒ:hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)โ†’homhdโ€‹๐’žRโก(X,Y)\beta\colon\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right)\to\hom_{h_{d}\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right). For this, consider a map f:Kโ†’hom๐’žRโก(X,Y)f\colon K\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right). The composition ฮธโˆ˜f\theta\circ f is represented by the restriction f|Kdโˆ’1f|_{K^{d-1}}, which corresponds to the map f|Kdโˆ’1ยฏ:Jโก(Kdโˆ’1)โ†’๐’ž\overline{f|_{K^{d-1}}}\colon J\left(K^{d-1}\right)\to\mathcal{C}. On the other hand, the composition ฮฒโˆ˜f\beta\circ f corresponds to the restriction of fยฏ:Jโก(K)โ†’๐’ž\overline{f}\colon J\left(K\right)\to\mathcal{C} to Jโ€‹(K)d+1J\left(K\right)^{d+1} and these are identified by ฮฑ\alpha. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer M. Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1902.04061v1

    Original source ยท 1902.04061v1