ScalingStacks

[0KES]

Lemma 2.17. Given simplicial sets A⊆BA\subseteq B and two maps f,g:B→hom𝒞R⁡(X,Y)f,g\colon B\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right), the following are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    f,g:B→hom𝒞R⁡(X,Y)f,g\colon B\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{R}\left(X,Y\right) agree on AA (resp. homotopic rel. AA).

  2. (2)

    F,G:B→hom𝒞M⁡(X,Y)F,G\colon B\to\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{M}\left(X,Y\right) agree on AA (resp. homotopic rel. AA).

  3. (3)

    f¯,g¯:J⁡(B)→C\overline{f},\overline{g}\colon J\left(B\right)\to C agree on J⁡(A)J\left(A\right) (resp. homotopic rel. J⁡(A)J\left(A\right)).

  4. (4)

    F¯,G¯:Σ⁡(B)→C\overline{F},\overline{G}\colon\Sigma\left(B\right)\to C agree on Σ⁡(A)\Sigma\left(A\right) (resp. homotopic rel. Σ⁡(A)\Sigma\left(A\right)).

[0KET]

Proof. We start with the equivalence (1)⇔(2)\left(1\right)\iff\left(2\right). The first part follows from the fact that Φ\Phi is a monomorphism and the second part follows from the fact that Φ\Phi is a homotopy equivalence of Kan complexes. In the equivalence (3)⇔(4)\left(3\right)\iff\left(4\right), the first part follows from the fact that Σ​A→J⁡(A)\Sigma A\to J\left(A\right) is an epimorphism and the second part can be seen as follows: the maps f¯,g¯:J⁡(B)→𝒞\overline{f},\overline{g}\colon J\left(B\right)\to\mathcal{C} are homotopic rel J⁡(A)J\left(A\right) if and only if they are equivalent as elements of the ∞\infty-category that is the fiber over f¯|J⁡(A)=g¯|J⁡(A)\overline{f}|_{J\left(A\right)}=\overline{g}|_{J\left(A\right)} (which is also a homotopy fiber) of the categorical fibration 𝒞J⁡(B)→𝒞J⁡(A)\mathcal{C}^{J\left(B\right)}\to\mathcal{C}^{J\left(A\right)}. Since we have functorial categorical equivalences Σ⁡(A)​⟶∼​J​(A)\Sigma\left(A\right)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}J\left(A\right) and Σ⁡(B)​⟶∼​J​(B)\Sigma\left(B\right)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}J\left(B\right), this is the same as showing that the corresponding maps F¯,G¯:Σ⁡(B)→𝒞\overline{F},\overline{G}\colon\Sigma\left(B\right)\to\mathcal{C} are equivalent in the fiber of 𝒞Σ⁡(B)→𝒞Σ⁡(A)\mathcal{C}^{\Sigma\left(B\right)}\to\mathcal{C}^{\Sigma\left(A\right)} (which is also the homotopy fiber). This in turn is the same as having F¯,G¯\overline{F},\overline{G} homotopic rel. Σ​A\Sigma A. It is left to show the equivalence (2)⇔(4)\left(2\right)\iff\left(4\right). The first part is clear. The second part amounts to showing the equivalence of two extension problems. If F|A=G|AF|_{A}=G|_{A}, we get a map F∪AGF\cup_{A}G from B∪AB≃B⋊A∂Δ1B\cup_{A}B\simeq B\rtimes_{A}\partial\Delta^{1} to hom𝒞M⁡(X,Y)\hom_{\mathcal{C}}^{M}\left(X,Y\right) and FF and GG are homotopic rel. AA if and only if F∪AGF\cup_{A}G extends to the relative cylinder B⋊AΔ1B\rtimes_{A}\Delta^{1}. In terms of maps to 𝒞\mathcal{C}, this is equivalent to the extension problem

    Σ⁡(B⋊∂A⁡Δ1)                 𝒞   Σ⁡(B⋊AΔ1)           .\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 32.69794pt\hbox{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\vtop{\halign{\entry@#!@&&\entry@@#!@\cr&\cr\crcr}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-32.69794pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\Sigma\left(B\rtimes_{A}\partial\Delta^{1}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.69794pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-23.99998pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 56.69794pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\mathcal{C}}$}}}}}}}{\hbox{\kern-29.2101pt\raise-32.64001pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\Sigma\left(B\rtimes_{A}\Delta^{1}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@drawline@}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 56.69794pt\raise-3.40884pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@drawline@}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\lx@xy@drawline@}}\ignorespaces}}}}\ignorespaces.

On the other hand, from F¯|Σ​A=G¯|Σ​A\overline{F}|_{\Sigma A}=\overline{G}|_{\Sigma A} we get a map F¯∪Σ​AG¯\overline{F}\cup_{\Sigma A}\overline{G} from Σ​B⋊∂Σ​A⁡Δ1\Sigma B\rtimes_{\Sigma A}\partial\Delta^{1} to 𝒞\mathcal{C} and F¯\overline{F} and G¯\overline{G} are homotopic rel. Σ​A\Sigma A if and only if it extends to the relative cylinder Σ​B⋊Σ​AΔ1\Sigma B\rtimes_{\Sigma A}\Delta^{1}. By 2.16 for D=Δ1,∂Δ1D=\Delta^{1},\partial\Delta^{1}, the two extension problems are isomorphic. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer M. Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1902.04061v1

Original source · 1902.04061v1