ScalingStacks

Given a functor

ℬ{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{B}}π’žβ€‹at∞,{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{{\mathcal{C}\textup{at}}_{\infty}},}F\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F}

let us describe the salient features of the resulting cocartesian fibration

β„°{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{E}}ℬ{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{B}}f\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces f}

which it classifies.

  1. (1)

    Over an object bβˆˆβ„¬b\in\mathcal{B}, the fiber fβˆ’1​(b)βŠ‚β„°f^{-1}(b)\subset\mathcal{E} is canonically equivalent to F⁑(b)βˆˆπ’žβ€‹at∞F(b)\in{{\mathcal{C}\textup{at}}_{\infty}}.

  2. (2)

    Given a morphism b1β†’πœ‘b2b_{1}\xrightarrow{\varphi}b_{2} in ℬ\mathcal{B} and an object e∈fβˆ’1​(b1)e\in f^{-1}(b_{1}) of the fiber over its source, there is a canonical morphism

    eβ†’Ο†βˆ—β€‹(e)e\rightarrow\varphi_{*}(e)

    in β„°\mathcal{E} which projects to Ο†\varphi, called an ff-cocartesian lift (or simply a cocartesian lift) of Ο†\varphi relative to ee, such that the canonical equivalence fβˆ’1​(b2)≃F⁑(b2)f^{-1}(b_{2})\simeq F(b_{2}) identifies the object Ο†βˆ—β€‹(e)∈fβˆ’1​(b2)\varphi_{*}(e)\in f^{-1}(b_{2}) with the object (F​φ)​(e)∈F⁑(b2)(F\varphi)(e)\in F(b_{2}). This is illustrated in FigureΒ 1.

    e{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e}Ο†βˆ—β€‹(e){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\varphi_{*}(e)}β„°{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{E}}   ℬ{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{B}}π’žβ€‹at∞{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{{\mathcal{C}\textup{at}}_{\infty}}}b1{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces b_{1}}b2{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces b_{2}}     F⁑(b1){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F(b_{1})}F⁑(b2){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F(b_{2})}e{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e}(F​φ)​(e){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces(F\varphi)(e)}f\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces f}F\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F}Ο†\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\varphi}F​φ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F\varphi}
    Figure 1. An illustration of a cocartesian morphism.
  3. (3)

    An arbitrary morphism e1β†’e2e_{1}\rightarrow e_{2} in β„°\mathcal{E} admits a unique factorization as a cocartesian morphism followed by a morphism lying in the fiber fβˆ’1​(b2)f^{-1}(b_{2}) – which we will therefore refer to as a fiber morphism –, as illustrated in FigureΒ 2.

    e1{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e_{1}}Οˆβˆ—β€‹(e1){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\psi_{*}(e_{1})}e2{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e_{2}}β„°{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{E}}   ℬ{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\mathcal{B}}π’žβ€‹at∞{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces{{\mathcal{C}\textup{at}}_{\infty}}}b1{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces b_{1}}b2{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces b_{2}}     F⁑(b1){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F(b_{1})}F⁑(b2){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F(b_{2})}e1{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e_{1}}(Fβ€‹Οˆ)​(e1){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces(F\psi)(e_{1})}e2{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces e_{2}}f\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces f}F\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F}ψ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\psi}Fβ€‹Οˆ\scriptstyle{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces F\psi}
    Figure 2. An illustration of the factorization system in a cocartesian fibration.

    Under the equivalence fβˆ’1​(b2)≃F⁑(b2)f^{-1}(b_{2})\simeq F(b_{2}), the morphism Οˆβˆ—β€‹(e1)β†’e2\psi_{*}(e_{1})\rightarrow e_{2} in fβˆ’1​(b2)f^{-1}(b_{2}) corresponds to a morphism (Fβ€‹Οˆ)​(e1)β†’e2(F\psi)(e_{1})\rightarrow e_{2} in F⁑(b2)F(b_{2}). Thus, we have canonical equivalences

    homℰ⁑(e1,e2)≃homfβˆ’1​(b2)⁑(Οˆβˆ—β€‹(e1),e2)≃homF⁑(b2)⁑((Fβ€‹Οˆ)​(e1),e2)\hom_{\mathcal{E}}(e_{1},e_{2})\simeq\hom_{f^{-1}(b_{2})}(\psi_{*}(e_{1}),e_{2})\simeq\hom_{F(b_{2})}((F\psi)(e_{1}),e_{2})

    of hom-spaces.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Aaron Mazel-Gee

Original source: arXiv:1510.02402v1