We next show condition . Suppose is an object of . By Proposition 3.6 there is an -preenvelope . Write and extend the morphism to a distinguished triangle:
| (4.1) |
We claim that for . Consider the following long exact sequence obtained from (4.1):
Now, by Lemma 4.3, we see that is an isomorphism for all . Hence for all and . Hence the distinguished triangle in (4.1) above gives us the required distinguished triangle.
Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2