Now suppose and suppose we have constructed a chain of objects and morphisms
with for , and where is either the identity map or sits in a distinguished triangle
If then set and take to be the identity map . If not, we can choose a, possibly infinite, coproduct of copies of and a nonzero morphism which becomes an isomorphism under , and then extend it to a distinguished triangle:
| (3.2) |
As above, an argument from the long exact sequence of Hom-sets arising from (3.2) shows that
The case follows by the injectivity of ; and the case by its surjectivity.
Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2