Lemma 3.3. Suppose further that is a simply connected corigid object of . Then, for the -preenvelope, , obtained in Proposition 3.2, we have that
is an isomorphism for all .
Lemma 3.3. Suppose further that is a simply connected corigid object of . Then, for the -preenvelope, , obtained in Proposition 3.2, we have that
is an isomorphism for all .
Proof: Applying the functor to distinguished triangle (3.4),
for in the proof of Proposition 3.2 shows that
is an isomorphism for all . The isomorphism for follows by the fact that the morphism in (3.4) is constructed to be an isomorphism under . Hence the composite is an isomorphism under for all .
Original source: arXiv:0705.0102v2