ScalingStacks

[0KF2]

Lemma 3.8. Let p:๐’ชโŠ—โ†’๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—p\colon\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}\to\mathbf{Fin}_{*} be an โˆž\infty-operad.

  1. (1)

    The map pd:(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—โ†’๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—p_{d}\colon\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}\to\mathbf{Fin}_{*} is a dd-operad.

  2. (2)

    The canonical map ฮธd:๐’ชโ†’hdโ€‹๐’ช\theta_{d}\colon\mathcal{O}\to h_{d}\mathcal{O} is a map of โˆž\infty-operads.

  3. (3)

    Given an โˆž\infty-operad map F:๐’ชโ†’๐’ฐF\colon\mathcal{O}\to\mathcal{U}, the induced map hdโ€‹F:hdโ€‹๐’ชโ†’hdโ€‹๐’ฐh_{d}F\colon h_{d}\mathcal{O}\to h_{d}\mathcal{U} on dd-homotopy operads, is an โˆž\infty-operad map.

[0KF3]

Proof. For d=โˆ’1d=-1, there is nothing to prove in (1)โ€“(3) and so we assume that dโ‰ฅ0d\geq 0.

(1) For d=0d=0, it is clear that (h0โ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{0}\mathcal{\mathcal{O}}\right)^{\otimes} is a skeletal 11-category, with p0p_{0} fully faithful; and for dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1, it is clear that (hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{\mathcal{O}}\right)^{\otimes} is a dd-category. Hence, we only need to show that (hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{\mathcal{O}}\right)^{\otimes} is an โˆž\infty-operad. For this we need to check the three conditions of Definition A.2.1.1.10.

  • โ€ข

    Since p:๐’ชโŠ—โ†’๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—p\colon\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}\to\mathbf{Fin}_{*} is an โˆž\infty-operad, for every inert morphism f:โŸจmโŸฉโ†’โŸจnโŸฉf\colon\left\langle m\right\rangle\to\left\langle n\right\rangle and an object Xยฏโˆˆhdโ€‹๐’ชโŸจmโŸฉโŠ—\overline{X}\in h_{d}\mathcal{O}_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\otimes}, we can lift Xยฏ\overline{X} to Xโˆˆ๐’ชโŸจmโŸฉโŠ—X\in\mathcal{O}_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\otimes} and find a coCartesian lift g:Xโ†’Yg\colon X\to Y of ff in ๐’ชโŠ—\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}. For dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1, the image gยฏ\overline{g} of gg in (hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes} is a coCartesian lift of ff by 3.3. For d=0d=0, we use the dual of T.2.4.4.3 to show that gยฏ\overline{g} is coCartesian. (h0โ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—โ†’๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—\left(h_{0}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}\to\mathbf{Fin}_{*} is an inner fibration (as the nerve of a functor of ordinary categories) and for every Zยฏโˆˆ(h0โ€‹๐’ช)โŸจmโŸฉโŠ—\overline{Z}\in\left(h_{0}\mathcal{O}\right)_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\otimes}, pre-composition with gยฏ\overline{g} induces a diagram

    ย ย ย ย Map(h0โ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—โก(Yยฏ,Zยฏ)ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Map(h0โ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—โก(Xยฏ,Zยฏ)ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Map๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—โก(โŸจmโŸฉ,โŸจkโŸฉ)ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Map๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—โก(โŸจnโŸฉ,โŸจkโŸฉ)ย ย ย ย ,\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 42.02347pt\hbox{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\vtop{\halign{\entry@#!@&&\entry@@#!@\cr&\cr&\crcr}}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-36.83408pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}_{\left(h_{0}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}}\left(\overline{Y},\overline{Z}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-24.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 69.82396pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 69.82396pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}_{\left(h_{0}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}}\left(\overline{X},\overline{Z}\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 106.65804pt\raise-24.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern-42.02347pt\raise-32.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}_{\mathbf{Fin}_{*}}\left(\left\langle m\right\rangle,\left\langle k\right\rangle\right)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 66.02347pt\raise-32.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\lx@xy@droprule}}{\hbox{\kern 66.02347pt\raise-32.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\operatorname{Map}_{\mathbf{Fin}_{*}}\left(\left\langle n\right\rangle,\left\langle k\right\rangle\right)}$}}}}}}}\ignorespaces}}}}\ignorespaces,

    and it is easy to verify that it is a homotopy pullback.

  • โ€ข

    Let Xยฏโˆˆ(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŸจmโŸฉโŠ—\overline{X}\in\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)_{\left\langle m\right\rangle}^{\otimes} and Yยฏโˆˆ(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŸจnโŸฉโŠ—\overline{Y}\in\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)_{\left\langle n\right\rangle}^{\otimes} and let f:โŸจmโŸฉโ†’โŸจnโŸฉf\colon\left\langle m\right\rangle\to\left\langle n\right\rangle be a morphism in ๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—\mathbf{Fin}_{*}. We first observe that

    Map(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—fโก(X,Y)โ‰ƒhdโˆ’1โ€‹(Map๐’ชโŠ—fโก(X,Y)).\operatorname{Map}_{\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}}^{f}\left(X,Y\right)\simeq h_{d-1}\left(\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}}^{f}\left(X,Y\right)\right).

    For dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1 this follows from 2.13 and for d=0d=0 it follows directly from the definition. Hence,

    Map(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—fโก(X,Y)\displaystyle\operatorname{Map}_{\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}}^{f}\left(X,Y\right) โ‰ƒ\displaystyle\simeq hdโˆ’1โ€‹(Map๐’ชโŠ—fโก(X,Y))โ‰ƒhdโˆ’1โ€‹(โˆ1โ‰คiโ‰คnMap๐’ชโŠ—ฯiโˆ˜fโก(X,Yi))\displaystyle h_{d-1}\left(\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}}^{f}\left(X,Y\right)\right)\simeq h_{d-1}\left(\prod_{1\leq i\leq n}\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}}^{\rho^{i}\circ f}\left(X,Y_{i}\right)\right)
    โ‰ƒ\displaystyle\simeq โˆ1โ‰คiโ‰คnhdโˆ’1โ€‹(Map๐’ชโŠ—ฯiโˆ˜fโก(X,Yi))โ‰ƒโˆ1โ‰คiโ‰คnMap(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—ฯiโˆ˜fโก(X,Yi).\displaystyle\prod_{1\leq i\leq n}h_{d-1}\left(\operatorname{Map}_{\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}}^{\rho^{i}\circ f}\left(X,Y_{i}\right)\right)\simeq\prod_{1\leq i\leq n}\operatorname{Map}_{\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}}^{\rho^{i}\circ f}\left(X,Y_{i}\right).

    Note that we use the fact that hdh_{d} preserves finite products of spaces.

  • โ€ข

    For every finite collection of objects Xยฏ1,โ€ฆ,Xยฏnโˆˆ(hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŸจ1โŸฉโŠ—\overline{X}_{1},\dots,\overline{X}_{n}\in\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)_{\left\langle 1\right\rangle}^{\otimes} that are lifted to objects of ๐’ชโŸจ1โŸฉโŠ—\mathcal{O}_{\left\langle 1\right\rangle}^{\otimes}, there is an object Xโˆˆ๐’ชโŸจnโŸฉโŠ—X\in\mathcal{O}_{\left\langle n\right\rangle}^{\otimes} and coCartesian morphisms fi:Xโ†’Xif_{i}\colon X\to X_{i} covering ฯi:โŸจnโŸฉโ†’โŸจ1โŸฉ\rho^{i}\colon\left\langle n\right\rangle\to\left\langle 1\right\rangle. The images of those maps in hdโ€‹๐’ชโŠ—h_{d}\mathcal{O}^{\otimes} are coCartesian as well and satisfy the analogous property.

(2) From the proof of (1), ฮธd\theta_{d} maps inert morphisms in ๐’ชโŠ—\mathcal{O}^{\otimes} to inert morphisms in hdโ€‹๐’ชโŠ—h_{d}\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}.

(3) We need to show that hdโ€‹Fh_{d}F maps inert morphisms to inert morphisms. For d=0d=0, this is automatic. For dโ‰ฅ1d\geq 1, let fยฏ:Xโ†’Y\overline{f}\colon X\to Y be an inert morphism in (hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes}. There is a coCartesian morphism f:Xโ†’Yโ€ฒf\colon X\to Y^{\prime} in ๐’ชโŠ—\mathcal{O}^{\otimes} with the same image as fยฏ\overline{f} in ๐…๐ข๐งโˆ—\mathbf{Fin}_{*}; hence its image in (hdโ€‹๐’ช)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{O}\right)^{\otimes} is equivalent to ff. Since the composition ๐’ชโŠ—โ†’๐’ฐโŠ—โ†’(hdโ€‹๐’ฐ)โŠ—\mathcal{O}^{\otimes}\to\mathcal{U}^{\otimes}\to\left(h_{d}\mathcal{U}\right)^{\otimes} preserves inert morphisms, it follows that the image of ff in (hdโ€‹๐’ฐ)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{U}\right)^{\otimes} is inert and since the image of fยฏ\overline{f} in (hdโ€‹๐’ฐ)โŠ—\left(h_{d}\mathcal{U}\right)^{\otimes} is equivalent to the image of ff, it is inert as well. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Tomer M. Schlank, Lior Yanovski

Original source: arXiv:1902.04061v1

Original source ยท 1902.04061v1